2000
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2000.18.3.651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Using Positron Emission Tomography

Abstract: PET can detect head and neck tumor recurrence when it may be undetectable by other clinical methods. FDG-PET permits highly accurate detection of head and neck cancer recurrence in the posttherapy period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
100
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of several prior studies using sequential PET in the follow-up of HNSCC support our findings [6,19,21,22,24]. In a retrospective study of 156 patients treated for HNSCC, the sensitivity and NPV of PET/CT for recurrence were 92.5% and 95%, compared with 55% and 77% for conventional evaluation methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results of several prior studies using sequential PET in the follow-up of HNSCC support our findings [6,19,21,22,24]. In a retrospective study of 156 patients treated for HNSCC, the sensitivity and NPV of PET/CT for recurrence were 92.5% and 95%, compared with 55% and 77% for conventional evaluation methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In small series, PET/CT seems to offer advantages in the detection of recurrent or persistent disease, with specificity and sensitivity close to 100%, as compared with 75% for CT or MRI (11,12) . In the present study, PET/CT was utilized for assessment of response to radiotherapy (either in association or not with chemotherapy) in 22 cases (35%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all such conditions changes in the approach may potentially occur (10) . In some series, the second tumor incidence ranged between 11.1% and 12.9% (11,12) , while lymph node disease presented specificity of 87% to 100% and sensitivity between 47% and 100% (13) . As from October 2009, the Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhynolaryngology of Hospital Heliópolis started utilizing PET/CT for selected cases (either for initial staging, evaluation of post-treatment response, or investigation for recurrences or distant metastasis), whose usual evaluation methods were not safe with respect to prognosis of the neoplasms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the specificity and false-positive rates should be considered critically in comparison with other studies that report only a single scan in a treated patient. 10,11,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] In a recent meta-analysis of studies investigating the effectiveness of a single PET scan after RT that included patients with suspected disease recurrence, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94%, 82%, 75%, and 95%, respectively. 25 In our experience, false-positive findings in the head and neck remain an issue for PET or PET/CT in the followup care of patients with head and neck cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%