2016
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance of adverse events associated with local anaesthesia for cataract surgery in Australia and New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the risk of complications, these patients need to be identified by other means such as ultrasound imaging. Alternatively, use of needle blocks could be reduced by utilising existing safer techniques [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce the risk of complications, these patients need to be identified by other means such as ultrasound imaging. Alternatively, use of needle blocks could be reduced by utilising existing safer techniques [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently in Australia, the most common form of anaesthesia for cataract surgery is the peribulbar block [ 1 ]. One of the most common techniques uses 25 mm 25 gauge needle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, there has been a trend towards lower utilization of sharp needle blocks (retrobulbar and peribulbar anaesthesia) and increasing use of subTenon blocks, TIA and topical anaesthesia . Use of TIA eliminates the risks of eye blocks, which include globe perforation (2.23 per 10 000 cases), periorbital haemorrhage (2.9 per 10 000 cases) and central retinal artery occlusion (0.7 per 10 000 cases) . The recently described paracentral acute middle maculopathy has not been observed after TIA .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature PAMM is rare. Using peribulbar or sub‐Tenon techniques for cataract surgery, the incidence in Australia and New Zealand is estimated to be 1 in 31 400 . A similar audit in the United Kingdom reports a much lower incidence of 1 in 211 700 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%