2001
DOI: 10.1080/104732201753214080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance of Safety and Health Programs and Needs in Small U.S. Businesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend has been observed at the national level for the metal fabrication trades [OSHA, 2004d]. Lentz et al [2001] analyzed OSHA inspection data for the manufacturing sector from 1979 to 1999 and found that very small manufacturing facilities (<10 employees) were less frequently inspected and cited for violations when compared to larger sized facilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A similar trend has been observed at the national level for the metal fabrication trades [OSHA, 2004d]. Lentz et al [2001] analyzed OSHA inspection data for the manufacturing sector from 1979 to 1999 and found that very small manufacturing facilities (<10 employees) were less frequently inspected and cited for violations when compared to larger sized facilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…SMEs have had difficulty identifying and characterizing workplace chemical hazards. (30) CB offers practical help. CB models encourage SMEs and workers to develop a greater appreciation for the factors that contribute to occupational exposure risk.…”
Section: Ease Of Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is uncertain the degree to which the result can be generalized to earlier time periods. The nding that higher concentrations occurred in small companies may relate to less focus on health and safety, fewer nancial resources to purchase new and cleaner technology, (30) or the result may be due to chance. Since this nding was only of borderline signi cance, it needs to be conrmed in future studies.…”
Section: Table IVmentioning
confidence: 98%