2009
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.154831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance of severe chemical corneal injuries in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
41
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 -26 Alkaline was the most common causative agent (66.7%) among chemical injuries in a series from the United Kingdom. 27 The incidence is probably higher in developing countries based on the number of surgical procedures performed. 28 Prompt irrigation of the injured eye at the site of injury and in the emergency clinic is vital to prevent blindness; advanced stages are more difficult to treat because of stem cell FIGURE 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 -26 Alkaline was the most common causative agent (66.7%) among chemical injuries in a series from the United Kingdom. 27 The incidence is probably higher in developing countries based on the number of surgical procedures performed. 28 Prompt irrigation of the injured eye at the site of injury and in the emergency clinic is vital to prevent blindness; advanced stages are more difficult to treat because of stem cell FIGURE 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developed countries, the rate of such injuries is low; however in developing countries it is increasing. A study conducted in the United Kingdom, the incidence of serious chemical eye injury was 0.02 per 100 thousand people [8]. Another study from China reported that ocular chemical burns are 1.2-1.7% of all burns, and 33% of the entire chemical burns involved eyes [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe chemical injuries predominantly men of working age, with alkali injuries accounting for 66.7% of cases in this subgroup 1 . In this report clinical features at presentation included significant eyelid damage in 33.3% and symblepharon formation in 16.6% of cases (Macdonald et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%