2018
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.12.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance or resection after chemoradiation in esophageal cancer

Abstract: The treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer continues to evolve. Previously, surgery was considered the foundation of treatment, but chemoradiation (CRT) has taken on a larger role both in the neoadjuvant setting and as definitive treatment. It has become clear that although some patients benefit from esophagectomy after CRT, a large subset of patients likely derive no benefit, and may be harmed by surgery.Some patients are cured from CRT alone and therefore do not need surgery. Another group of patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…55 After CRT, surgery is beneficial in the subset of patients who have remaining locally advanced disease but would not have value for patients harboring undetected metastatic disease or for those who have experienced a complete pathologic response after CRT. 56,57 In the CROSS trial, approximately 50% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma had a complete pathologic response after CRT, meaning no viable tumor cells were detected on histologic examination in the primary tumor or resected regional lymph nodes. Therefore, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma who respond to CRT, a selective surgery approach may be considered 24,58 where there are no signs of distant dissemination.…”
Section: Subgroup Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 After CRT, surgery is beneficial in the subset of patients who have remaining locally advanced disease but would not have value for patients harboring undetected metastatic disease or for those who have experienced a complete pathologic response after CRT. 56,57 In the CROSS trial, approximately 50% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma had a complete pathologic response after CRT, meaning no viable tumor cells were detected on histologic examination in the primary tumor or resected regional lymph nodes. Therefore, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma who respond to CRT, a selective surgery approach may be considered 24,58 where there are no signs of distant dissemination.…”
Section: Subgroup Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the preferred treatment for localized ESCA is CRT followed by surgery, a significant subgroup of patients are medically unfit to undergo surgery or refuse it and for these patients, definitive CRT is an accepted treatment option 30,31 . In our cohort, we identified 12 patients receiving only CRT with both ctDNA and PET-CT evaluable following treatment (EAC, n = 10; ESCC, n = 2).…”
Section: Integration Of Ctdna and Pet-ct In Patients Receiving Definitive Crtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Trimodality therapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has become the standard of care for many patients. 2 Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer can be done through an open transhiatal, transthoracic (2-stage or Ivor-Lewis) or 3-stage (McKeon) procedure. 3, In addition, with the advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy, 4 it has shown improvement in postoperative outcomes by reducing postoperative pulmonary complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%