2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-009-1012-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance study of apparent life-threatening events (ALTE) in the Netherlands

Abstract: SIDS and ALTE are different entities that somehow show some similarities. Both constitute heterogeneous conditions. The Netherlands is a low-incidence country for SIDS. To study whether the same would hold for ALTE, we studied the incidence, etiology, and current treatment of ALTE in The Netherlands. Using the Dutch Pediatric Surveillance Unit, pediatricians working in second-and third-level hospitals in the Netherlands were asked to report any case of ALTE presented in their hospital from

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(63 reference statements)
4
45
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The HDR putative codes we selected were mainly suggested by the paediatricians in the ALTE unit who were involved in the diagnostic ALTE Italian guidelines document (5) and had been using those codes for years. The incidence estimate from the HDR database was in accordance with the wider incidence range of 0.5-10.0 per 1000 live births reported by population surveys based on hospital records (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) and also by the 2.46 per 1000 live births reported by a study in the Tyrol area of Italy (11), which used the same administrative database as our study and similar putative morbidity codes for 1993-2001. The 37% of idiopathic ALTE HDR records we found were also similar to the 45% found in the Tyrol study (11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The HDR putative codes we selected were mainly suggested by the paediatricians in the ALTE unit who were involved in the diagnostic ALTE Italian guidelines document (5) and had been using those codes for years. The incidence estimate from the HDR database was in accordance with the wider incidence range of 0.5-10.0 per 1000 live births reported by population surveys based on hospital records (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) and also by the 2.46 per 1000 live births reported by a study in the Tyrol area of Italy (11), which used the same administrative database as our study and similar putative morbidity codes for 1993-2001. The 37% of idiopathic ALTE HDR records we found were also similar to the 45% found in the Tyrol study (11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…11,12 They recorded each study's relevance to the clinical question, research design, setting, time period covered, sample size, patient eligibility criteria, data source, variables collected, key results, study e6 in the updated (n = 18) and original (n = 37) systematic review (Supplemental Table 7). 6,7,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The resulting systematic review was used to develop the guideline recommendations by following the policy statement from the AAP Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management, "Classifying Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guidelines." 29 Decisions and the strength of recommendations were based on a systematic grading of the quality of evidence from the updated literature review by 2 independent reviewers and incorporation of the previous systematic review.…”
Section: Patient Factors That Determine a Lower Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a national surveillance survey of all secondary and tertiary care facilities in the Netherlands in 2002, the percentage of premature infants who experienced an ALTE (29.5%) was over twice the percentage in the general population (13%). (2) With an awareness of the role of central respiratory control immaturity in ALTE, the issue of age-based risk more logically focuses on an infant's postconceptual rather than postnatal age. Lack of identification of infants' postconceptional age in earlier studies may explain apparent discrepancies between earlier and more recent studies.…”
Section: What We Have Learned Since Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%