Abstract. The field of mobile learning is growing an exponential rate. To best understand this field, it is crucial to gain a collective understanding of the research that has taken place. There are a number of recent studies which looked at collective trends in mobile learning across subjects. However, these results do not provide insight into specific subject areas. This meta-analysis reveals the trends in mobile learning in mathematics with a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of 48 studies from the year 2000 onward. Major findings include that most of the studies focus on effectiveness, followed by learning design. Mobile phones are currently the most widely used device used. Also, the use of mobile devices for mathematics learning is most common in elementary (5-11 years old) school settings.Keywords: mathematics, literature, mobile learning, mlearning, meta-analysis, research.
IntroductionMobile learning is now receiving increasing attention as a way to transform and rejuvenate educational practices [1,2,3]. To better understand the field of mobile learning, the research needs to be compiled to gain a complete picture of the field. This review of the literature will provide information on the trends and patterns of the development and the usage patterns of mobile technologies and learning. This will provide a springboard for future studies. There are those who have completed a recent mobile learning meta-analysis with a learner focus [e.g.4, 5] and those who have focused on the device and software [e.g. 6]. Although these meta-analyses provide a rich source of information on mobile learning, they do not provide a wealth of data on a particular subject. Therefore, the meta-analysis can only be used as generalizable information. The purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis on mobile learning as it relates to mathematics. The researchers will parse out pertinent information to provide a comprehensive examination of this topic. Other recent meta-analysis [e.g. 4, 6, 5] have used only peer reviewed articles. This is problematic as journals on average take eight to nine months to be published.