1989
DOI: 10.1002/0471725277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey Errors and Survey Costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
966
2
64

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,272 publications
(1,052 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
20
966
2
64
Order By: Relevance
“…Managers, directors, or owners of these companies were contacted in September-October 2009 via telephone as well as e-mail to complete a structured survey (see Appendix). As per discussion in texts such as Edwards et al (1997) and Groves (2004), a combination of open-ended and closed questions was developed to glean insight into the business perspective regarding carbon-offset challenges identified in the literature. The survey was based on and expanded from Butzengeiger (2005) and Gössling et al (2007) and was piloted prior to being used for the full interviews with company representatives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers, directors, or owners of these companies were contacted in September-October 2009 via telephone as well as e-mail to complete a structured survey (see Appendix). As per discussion in texts such as Edwards et al (1997) and Groves (2004), a combination of open-ended and closed questions was developed to glean insight into the business perspective regarding carbon-offset challenges identified in the literature. The survey was based on and expanded from Butzengeiger (2005) and Gössling et al (2007) and was piloted prior to being used for the full interviews with company representatives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data and methods section describes the experiment in more detail sampling frame (Groves 1989). In the Netherlands, (semi)-governmental and scientific institutes mainly use the postal data service (delivery sequence file) or population register as a sampling frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response rate to the Followup Survey was slightly lower than in previous Followup Surveys, averaging some 24% over the random sample of freshmen entering four-year colleges and universities. The lower thanexpected rate can most probably be attributed to (a) the continuing general decline in response rates to mail surveys caused by the arrival of massmailing advertising campaigns (see Groves, 1989); and (b) the expansion of the Followup Survey form from its typical fourpage format to an expanded sixpage version. Response rates for the random sample by institutional type can be found in Table 2.2.…”
Section: Testing Agencies Also Provided Scores For the Graduate Recormentioning
confidence: 96%