Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a surge in research activity while restricting data collection methods, leading to a rise in survey-based studies. Anecdotal evidence suggests this increase in neurosurgical survey dissemination has led to a phenomenon of survey fatigue, characterized by decreased response rates and reducing the quality of data. This paper aims to analyze the effect of COVID-19 on neurosurgery surveys and their response rates, and suggest strategies for improving survey data collection.Methods: A search was conducted on March 20, 2021, on Medline and EMBASE. This included the terms “neurosurgery,” “cranial surgery,” “spine surgery,” and “survey” and identified surveys written in English, on a neurosurgical topic, distributed to neurosurgeons, trainees, and medical students. Results were screened by two authors according to these inclusion criteria, and included articles were used for data extraction, univariable, and bivariable analysis with Fisher's exact-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Spearman's correlation.Results: We included 255 articles in our analysis, 32.3% of which were published during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys had an average of 25.6 (95% CI = 22.5–28.8) questions and were mostly multiple choice (78.8%). They were disseminated primarily by email (75.3%, 95% CI = 70.0–80.6%) and there was a significant increase in dissemination via social media during the pandemic (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.30–12.0). COVID-19 surveys were distributed to more geographical regions than pre-pandemic surveys (2.1 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01) and had higher total responses (247.0 vs. 206.4, P = 0.01), but lower response rates (34.5 vs. 51.0%, P < 0.001) than pre-COVID-19 surveys.Conclusion: The rise in neurosurgical survey distribution during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to survey fatigue, reduced response rates, and data collection quality. We advocate for population targeting to avoid over-researching, collaboration between research teams to minimize duplicate surveys, and communication with respondents to convey study importance, and we suggest further strategies to improve response rates in neurosurgery survey data collection.

Australian and Danish nurses’ and midwives’ wellbeing during COVID-19: A comparison study

“…Although the study had a large sample size, the response rate was relatively low in the Australian health services. Nevertheless, the response rate is similar to that of other studies conducted during an infectious disease outbreak ( Maunder et al, 2004 ); and it has been suggested that survey-based studies among healthcare workers have had lower response rates during the COVID-19 pandemic than prior to the pandemic (34.5% vs. 51.0%, p<0.001) ( de Koning et al, 2021 ). It was also not possible to determine the number of nurses and midwives who received the email invitation to complete the survey.…”

The Mediating Role of Gender, Age, COVID-19 Symptoms and Changing of Mansion on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers Operating in Italy during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…The low response rates highlighted a possible lack of interest in participating in the study in a tragic and unexpected historical period such as the pandemic, which has led to an upheaval in family and work habits; the length of the survey; the absence of certainty of protection of privacy and confidentiality are all factors. As described in a previous study [ 31 ], the COVID-19 pandemic has led to survey fatigue characterized by non-response, with a consequent decrease of response rate during the pandemic. This could be explained by the fact that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of surveys created and disseminated has increased significantly with the consequence that HCWs may feel overwhelmed with the number of survey requests, also due to the great increase in social media dissemination during the COVID-19 pandemic that can contribute to the illusion that survey requests are omnipresent.…”

Usability of Virtual Visits for the Routine Clinical Care of Trans Youth during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Youth and Caregiver Perspectives

“…In addition, we had a modest response rate. This appears to be a relatively frequent issue for online surveys, and it is possible that it might have been exacerbated by the pandemic [43,44]. While it could be postulated that the characteristics of this population may have also contributed to the low response rate, current studies evaluating survey responses among sexual minorities do not support this assumption [45].…”