1996
DOI: 10.1086/192317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey for Emission-Line Galaxies: Universidad Complutense de Madrid List 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the data were converted to photometric magnitudes using the extinction and zero point constants derived from observations of a set of standard stars from the lists of Thuan & Gunn (1976) and Kent (1985a) taken along each night. Table 2 presents the apparent magnitudes (the listed errors include photometric calibrations and poissonian contributions) which have been converted to absolute magnitudes using Ho = 50 km s-l Mpc-' and the redshift measured in the spectra, when available, by Gallego et al (1995). These values were corrected for galactic extinction using A, = 2.51 E ( B -V ) , where E ( B -V ) was determined from the Burstein & Heiles (1982) maps at the galactic coordinates of each UCM object.…”
Section: Basic Reduction and Caiibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Then, the data were converted to photometric magnitudes using the extinction and zero point constants derived from observations of a set of standard stars from the lists of Thuan & Gunn (1976) and Kent (1985a) taken along each night. Table 2 presents the apparent magnitudes (the listed errors include photometric calibrations and poissonian contributions) which have been converted to absolute magnitudes using Ho = 50 km s-l Mpc-' and the redshift measured in the spectra, when available, by Gallego et al (1995). These values were corrected for galactic extinction using A, = 2.51 E ( B -V ) , where E ( B -V ) was determined from the Burstein & Heiles (1982) maps at the galactic coordinates of each UCM object.…”
Section: Basic Reduction and Caiibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the BCD category usually encompasses objects with a wide variety of properties, in the present work we classify as BCDs those galaxies having al1 of the following properties: compact appearance in the direct image, linear size (024) lower than 10 kpc, luminosity M, > -19, and photometric parameters typical of later Hubble types. Moreover, since the true nature as BCD must be spectroscopically confirmed, the spectral information available for these candidates (Gallego et al 1995) has also been used. After a detailed analysis of the types given by each criterion, which in a number of cases do not agree, and using the information from the inspection of the direct image, we have assigned a final morphological type to each object of the sample.…”
Section: ~3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations