2009
DOI: 10.3398/064.069.0402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey Indicators for Pygmy Rabbits: Temporal Trends of Burrow Systems and Pellets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified pellets based on size, shape, and color (Rachlow & Witham, 2004;Ulmschneider et al, 2004;Sanchez et al, 2009). Counts of fecal pellets have been used extensively to measure rabbit and hare day-use occurrences, population abundance, and activity (Forys & Humphrey, 1997;Sugimura & Yamada, 2004).…”
Section: Fecal Pellet Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We identified pellets based on size, shape, and color (Rachlow & Witham, 2004;Ulmschneider et al, 2004;Sanchez et al, 2009). Counts of fecal pellets have been used extensively to measure rabbit and hare day-use occurrences, population abundance, and activity (Forys & Humphrey, 1997;Sugimura & Yamada, 2004).…”
Section: Fecal Pellet Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counts of fecal pellets have been used extensively to measure rabbit and hare day-use occurrences, population abundance, and activity (Forys & Humphrey, 1997;Sugimura & Yamada, 2004). These counts have also been used to verify the presence of pygmy rabbits (Rachlow & Witham, 2004;Ulmschneider et al, 2004;Sanchez et al, 2009). To decrease biases caused by lack of experience (Neff, 1968), the same researchers counted pellets each month, and all individuals were trained to identify each species pellet by size, shape, and color (Rachlow & Witham, 2004;Ulmschneider et al, 2004;Sanchez et al, 2009).…”
Section: Fecal Pellet Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By understanding the relationship between burrow abundance and population abundance, researchers can save time and resources, which would normally be expended on mark-recapture studies, by merely counting animal burrows in a pre-defined area. This technique has been used with reasonable success with rodents such as Hypogeomys antimena (Young et al 2008) and Agouti paca (Beck-King et al 1999) as well as lagomorphs such as Brachylagus idahoensis (Price and Rachlow 2011;Sanchez et al 2009). However, in some rodent studies, burrow counts were a poor index of abundance with little or variable correlation to population size estimates (Gervais 2010;Severson and Plumb 1998;Van Horne et al 1997).…”
Section: Spoil Heapsmentioning
confidence: 99%