1998
DOI: 10.2307/1271416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey Measurement and Process Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If you need an updated survey-sampling book, this one is highly recommended for your consideration, Thompson, M. (1997) This is the latest collaboration of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association and this publisher. Most have been reported here, most recently Lybert et al (1997), reported by Ziegel(1998). Though somewhat remote from the core statistics for this journal, these books are uniformly state-of-the-art.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…If you need an updated survey-sampling book, this one is highly recommended for your consideration, Thompson, M. (1997) This is the latest collaboration of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association and this publisher. Most have been reported here, most recently Lybert et al (1997), reported by Ziegel(1998). Though somewhat remote from the core statistics for this journal, these books are uniformly state-of-the-art.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The relationship between study characteristics, operational definitions, and reported victimization prevalence is well documented (see, for example, Fisher & Cullen, 2000;Lyberg et al, 1997), but can be difficult to quantify. The meta-analysis performed here confirms the existing belief of the influence of study characteristics, while also drawing attention to just how sensitive childhood victimization prevalence is to such methodological choices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were initially contacted by email, in which they were sent a URL and QR codes to access the survey. After this, daily calls were made to the different institutions as a reminder to complete the survey [15, 16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%