2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey Methods of the 2018 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Japan Survey

Abstract: This paper describes the methods of the Wave 1 (2018) International Tobacco Control (ITC) Japan Survey. The respondents were adults aged 20 years and older in one of four user groups: (1) cigarette-only smokers who smoked at least monthly and used heated tobacco products (HTPs) not at all or less than weekly, (2) HTP-only users who used HTPs at least weekly and smoked cigarettes not at all or less than monthly, (3) cigarette-HTP dual users who smoked at least monthly and used HTPs at least weekly, and (4) non-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey response rate was 45.1%, and the cooperation rate was 96.3%. A detailed description of the ITC Japan Survey sample and methods is reported elsewhere [16,17]. Study procedures and materials were reviewed and cleared by the Office of Research Ethics, University of Waterloo, Canada (ORE# 22508/31428).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey response rate was 45.1%, and the cooperation rate was 96.3%. A detailed description of the ITC Japan Survey sample and methods is reported elsewhere [16,17]. Study procedures and materials were reviewed and cleared by the Office of Research Ethics, University of Waterloo, Canada (ORE# 22508/31428).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods are consistent with 30 other ITC countries across the global ITC Project. Using the same protocols enables comparability of analyses across ITC countries 7,8,[11][12][13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'natural experiments') 7 , in which one group exposed to a policy is compared to another, unexposed group; 2) the use of longitudinal cohort designs 8 in which individuals are measured on the same key outcome variables over time 9,10 ; and 3) the measurement of appropriate policy-specific variables that are conceptually close to the policy being evaluated and less likely to be affected by other factors. These innovative strategies, including other explanatory variables (covariates), are unparalleled in the study of population-level interventions and produce a research design with the potential to make strong inferences about policy impact [11][12][13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Introduction Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full description of the study methods (compliant with the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys [34]) and survey design is available elsewhere [35,36]. Briefly, respondents were recruited from the Rakuten Insight panel in Japan.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%