Survey of badger Meles meles damage to agriculture in England and Wales

Abstract

Summary1. In response to reported increases in badger numbers and associated agricultural damage, a questionnaire survey of 3600 land owner/occupiers was conducted in 1997 to determine the extent and signi®cance of badger damage in England and Wales. We assess the signi®cance of badger-induced damage and highlight problem regions, farm types and speci®c crops to allow targeting of future research eorts at amelioration. (This survey investigated alleged badger damage to agriculture but did not address the role of badgers in the transmission of bovine tuberculosis.) 2. The return rate of the questionnaire was 55´1% (n = 1982) and 150 of the responses were ground-truthed. 3. Almost 30% of those land owner/occupiers who responded reported that badger damage had occurred in the previous 12 months, and 57% reported an increase in damage during the past 5 years. 4. Badger damage was widespread, but its incidence was highly dependent on region and farm type. The most frequently reported damage (25´5%) resulted from badgers' burrowing activities (especially those causing damage to fences). Crop damage was also frequently reported (21´2%), with wheat, forage maize and vines being damaged most frequently. 5. Ground-truthing showed that incorrect attribution to badgers of damage was negligible and that the majority of respondents had assessed correctly the extent and cost of badger damage, except for predation on livestock where most`evidence' was circumstantial. 6. Most reported damage was of little economic consequence to individual land owners/occupiers; however, approximately 5% estimated that they had incurred costs of over £1000. 7. Assuming that the questionnaires returned were a random subset of those distributed, the mean estimated national cost was £41´5 million per annum (62% of which was due to burrowing activity). Assuming that all the non-respondents had no damage, the estimate was £21´5 million per annum. 8. Future research into management options for damage limitation should be targeted at the areas and situations of most signi®cant damage. These are primarily burrowing damage and direct crop damage to wheat, maize, vines, fruit and vegetables. The region suering the most intense damage was the south-west of England. The highly seasonal nature of the damage to some crops will allow preventative action to be taken at the most appropriate times. Predation by badgers on livestock is considered a small-scale and unproven problem.

Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods

“…Their position in the top of the food webs and their large potential impact on different human activities (game, agriculture, etc..., Saunders et al 1995;Reynolds. and Tapper 1996;Moore et al 1999) make this group especially significant in conservation and management actions. However, because carnivores are usually scarce, elusive and nocturnal, they are very difficult to count by traditional methods such as transects based on direct observation (e.g.…”

The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) during 2003–2007 in Germany

“…However, reliable large-scale population data are sparse today in most parts of Europe (Griffiths and Thomas 1997;Kowalczyk et al 2000;Sleeman et al 2009). Monitoring badgers is important for wildlife management (Eichstädt and Roth 1997;Sleeman et al 2009), agricultural damage (Roper et al 1995;Moore et al 1999;Schley 2000;Delahay et al 2009) and disease control (e.g. bovine tuberculosis in Britain and Ireland, Griffin et al 2005;Woodroffe et al 2008).…”

Trapping in predator management: catching the profile of trap users in Sweden

“…That being said badgers have been shown to be important nest predators in Sweden for game species such as the ring-necked pheasant (Erlinge et al 1984), and may also predate on nests from ground nesting birds of conservation interest (MacDonald and Bolton 2008). Badgers can also cause significant crop and burrowing damage (Moore et al 1999).…”