1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00252-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of ground, surface, and potable waters for the presence of Legionella species by EnviroAmpR PCR Legionella Kit, culture, and immunofluorescent staining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-two samples were positive using the IDS method, and 24 were positive by culture. Samples 17,18,30,33,34, and 35 were negative by IDS labeling and by culture. These samples correspond to cold domestic waters or well deep waters known to be free of Legionella.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-two samples were positive using the IDS method, and 24 were positive by culture. Samples 17,18,30,33,34, and 35 were negative by IDS labeling and by culture. These samples correspond to cold domestic waters or well deep waters known to be free of Legionella.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legionellae have been sporadically detected in groundwater (29,30,37). The increasing use of groundwater as a resource for potable water implies the need for more comprehensive data on the occurrence and distribution of legionellae in this type of environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of PCR-based assays have been developed for the detection and quantification of Legionella in water mainly using the 5S and 16S rRNA genes and the macrophage infectivity potentiator (mip) gene of L. pneumophila [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. However, these assays lack the ability to discriminate between living and dead (non-infectious) Legionella cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%