2002
DOI: 10.1080/02652030110088301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of residual solvents in natural food additives by standard addition head-space GC

Abstract: Residual levels of 12 solvents in 87 natural food additives (66 samples of food colours, 19 samples of natural antioxidants and two natural preservatives) collected between 1997 and 1999 were determined by automated head-space GC using FID, with a porous-polymer (PLOT) column. Calibration curves were prepared by the method of standard addition. Confirmation was by manually injected head-space GC using mass spectrometric detection. 1,2-Dichloroethane was found in turmeric colour (natural food colour) collected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest feasible concentration of the standard solution was 10 mg/mL, and 5 mg/g of these solvents in a sample (0.25 mL of 10 mg/mL standard solutions for 0.5 g of sample) was assumed to be the lowest for quantification. This is one-tenth of that obtained by the previously reported injection method 5) . The repeatability of this method was expressed in terms of by the standard deviations for five rounds of analysis of methanol and ethanol in licorice extracts, both with water-soluble and water-insoluble samples.…”
Section: Calibration Curves and Repeatabilitysupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest feasible concentration of the standard solution was 10 mg/mL, and 5 mg/g of these solvents in a sample (0.25 mL of 10 mg/mL standard solutions for 0.5 g of sample) was assumed to be the lowest for quantification. This is one-tenth of that obtained by the previously reported injection method 5) . The repeatability of this method was expressed in terms of by the standard deviations for five rounds of analysis of methanol and ethanol in licorice extracts, both with water-soluble and water-insoluble samples.…”
Section: Calibration Curves and Repeatabilitysupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Injection time (volume) and initial GC column oven temperature In order to obtain a su$cient GC peak area for a low concentration of methanol in the vapor phase of the vial, created at a low (50῎) temperature, the head-space vapor was injected for 0.75 min into the GC column, 10 to 20 times longer than previously reported 5) . GC peak areas increased with the increase of injection time.…”
Section: Solvents For Dissolving Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, depending on microorganism, scale, economics, and lipid application the method spectrum is narrowed to a few. Consequently, microbial lipids applied in food industry cannot be extracted with toxic solvents or should in the best case avoid any solvents to prevent solvent residues in food or contaminations with heavy metals (Uematsu et al, 2002 ; Sahena et al, 2009 ). Also, some methods may be highly suitable for analytical purposes but may not be applicable in industrial large scale operations due to high costs or simply a non-scalable extraction set-up.…”
Section: Downstream Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…); the column oven temperature program and injection temperature were the same as described in section 5. Head-space GC was conducted as reported 4) , or (b) with a 25 mῌ0.25 mm i.d. column (PoraBond Q, film thickness 3 mm, Varian Chrompack International D.V.…”
Section: Gc/ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%