1995
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1995.13.3.756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of the provision of supportive care services at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

Abstract: Survey results provide data on SCS across a representative sample of NCI cancer centers and can be used to develop standards for future cancer control programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that our results may reflect an upper limit estimate or optimistic impression regarding the availability of support services in pediatric transplant centers. The survey instrument was developed by the investigators drawing in part on prior supportive care studies, 20,22 but it is a simple mailed survey rather than a standardized measure and its psychometric properties are unknown. In particular, the instrument was designed to be as brief as possible in order to maximize the response rate; hence, several areas of interest were omitted and merit attention in future research (eg, in-house services vs external referrals; screening of nutritional status; specific interventions for management of pain and fatigue; provision Table 4 Extended follow-up offered by pediatric transplant centers Notwithstanding these limitations, current findings suggest that supportive care services might be enhanced by more consistent screening across a range of QOL domains (especially sleep disturbance and cognitive deficits), and by supplementing information from interviews or medical exams with data from standardized measures that capture the perspective of the child and/or parent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is possible that our results may reflect an upper limit estimate or optimistic impression regarding the availability of support services in pediatric transplant centers. The survey instrument was developed by the investigators drawing in part on prior supportive care studies, 20,22 but it is a simple mailed survey rather than a standardized measure and its psychometric properties are unknown. In particular, the instrument was designed to be as brief as possible in order to maximize the response rate; hence, several areas of interest were omitted and merit attention in future research (eg, in-house services vs external referrals; screening of nutritional status; specific interventions for management of pain and fatigue; provision Table 4 Extended follow-up offered by pediatric transplant centers Notwithstanding these limitations, current findings suggest that supportive care services might be enhanced by more consistent screening across a range of QOL domains (especially sleep disturbance and cognitive deficits), and by supplementing information from interviews or medical exams with data from standardized measures that capture the perspective of the child and/or parent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item construction was informed in part by previous supportive care surveys 20,22 and by interdisciplinary collaboration among the team's hematologist-oncologists, nurses, and behavioral scientists to enhance content validity, but with an emphasis on brevity and ease of administration. The instrument encompassed four selected components of pediatric supportive care, including (1) QOL screening, (2) psychosocial interventions, (3) support services for staff, and (4) long-term follow-up care.…”
Section: Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Une enquête similaire sur les services offerts par les centres de cancérologie agréés par le NCI des États-Unis constatait les taux de disponibilité suivants pour les thérapies complémentaires: 82 % offraient la relaxation, 56 % l'imagerie mentale dirigée, 46 % l'hypnothérapie, 39 % l'art thérapie, 36 % la musicothérapie et 26 % le massage (Coluzzi et al, 1995). En Ontario, un examen des centres régionaux de cancérologie révélait les taux de disponibilité ci-dessous: imagerie mentale dirigée (100 %), relaxation (100 %), art thérapie (38 %), hypnothérapie (38 %) et thérapie par contact avec les animaux (25 %) (Fitch, 1997).…”
unclassified