1972
DOI: 10.2172/4527550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of thermonuclear-reactor parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5; (3) graphite is employed for neutron moderation; and (4) the neutron leakage from the blanket is relatively low, ~4% of the source neutrons. These characteristics are similar to those of several blanket models under current investigation [4], and therefore, the cross-section sensitivity exhibited by the blanket model of this paper is representative of a large class of blanket models. The cross-section sensitivity of tritium-breeding calculations in other classes of blanket 2 models will be examined in subsequent papers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5; (3) graphite is employed for neutron moderation; and (4) the neutron leakage from the blanket is relatively low, ~4% of the source neutrons. These characteristics are similar to those of several blanket models under current investigation [4], and therefore, the cross-section sensitivity exhibited by the blanket model of this paper is representative of a large class of blanket models. The cross-section sensitivity of tritium-breeding calculations in other classes of blanket 2 models will be examined in subsequent papers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…2% because of slightly reduced downscattering competition. 4 3. The changes in T 6 are accompanied by an ~ 19% change in the number of (n, 2n) reactions and an ~4% change in the number of niobium absorptions.…”
Section: The Secondary-neutron Energy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table XIV shows that the effects on T 6 are fairly uniform in space. 4 Although the total non-elastic cross-section remains unchanged (the (n,2n) cross-section was reduced and the (n, n") cross-section was increased), the downscattering effectiveness is reduced because the (n, n') reaction is less effective in degrading the neutron energy than is the (n,2n) reaction.…”
Section: The Secondary-neutron Energy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%