“…Hence, variations in CT numbers of the same material directly translate into uncertainties in dose calculation. Several CT innovations, which improve the stability of CT numbers, have been widely implemented by now [16] : Iterative image reconstruction for reducing image noise [17] ; Metal artefact reduction for mitigating streak artefacts caused by beam hardening, scattering and photon starvation near metal objects [18] ; Beam hardening correction for reducing cupping artefacts and size dependencies of CT numbers in high-attenuating materials like bone or iodine [19] . However, the current inter-centre variation in stopping-power prediction from single-energy CT (SECT) using a Hounsfield look-up table (HLUT) still adds up to 2.5–3.0% in proton range as assessed by the European particle therapy network (EPTN) [20] , [21] .…”