Survey on impact of regulations on radiation safety and development of radiation safety culture in 25 countries

Berris, Theocharis; Žontar, D.; Rehani, Madan M.

doi:10.1117/1.jmi.4.3.031204

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A multinational study in 25 countries in Africa, Asia, and Europe suggested regulations have an impact on enhancing the radiation safety culture and a relatively high level of use of regulatory tools. 4 Skornik, however, noted in 2001 that most of the African countries were in the process of developing regulatory infrastructure. For example, 20 countries had a radiation protection law in force or in the final stage of its promulgation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of radiation protection and safety measures in Rwandan public hospitals: Readiness for the implementation of the new regulations

Maina

Motto

Hazell

2020

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An essential concept that all radiographers are required to implement is the use of techniques and the provision of protective devices to minimize radiation to patients and staff. Methods to achieve this could include good communication, immobilization, beam limitation, justification for radiation exposure, shielding, appropriate distances and optimum radiographic exposures factors.Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the availability and utilization of radiation protection and safety measures by medical imaging technologists (MITs) in Rwandan hospitals.Methods: A quantitative, non-experimental descriptive design was used and data collected by means of a self-designed questionnaire. One hundred and sixteen MITs (n ¼ 116) representing 96.67% of the total population participated in the study. Results:The study found radiation safety measures were not adequately implemented in government hospitals. Only 58.62% of MITs had radiation-measuring devices, with 29% receiving dose readings inconsistently. Lead rubber aprons were available at 99.13% of the hospitals; however, 59% of the participants had never checked the integrity of the aprons. Lead rubber aprons and lead equivalent barriers were most prevalent in the facilities.Contributors: First author contributed to the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis of the data and drafting of the paper. Second and third authors were involved in formulation and commenting on the paper and have approved the final version. Funding: This study did not receive any funding.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of radiation protection and safety measures in Rwandan public hospitals: Readiness for the implementation of the new regulations

Maina

Motto

Hazell

2020

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The implementation of an IMS for radiation safety varies across countries [ 61 , 62 ]. Some nations have established self-sufficient IMS, primarily due to their development or launch of peaceful nuclear reactors.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Overview of Appropriate Medical Practice and Preparedness in Radiation Emergency Response

Al-Ibraheem,

Moghrabi,

Abdlkadir

et al. 2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiation emergencies involving high doses of nuclear radiation pose significant risks from exposure to ionizing radiation in various scenarios. These situations include transportation accidents involving radioactive materials, occupational exposure, nuclear detonations, dirty bombs, and nuclear power plant accidents. In addition to the immediate risks of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and related diseases, longterm exposure can increase the risk of other health issues such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Vulnerable populations, including pregnant women and children, face particular concern due to potential impacts on their health and the health of unborn babies.The severity of ARS depends on several factors such as radiation dose, quality, dose rate, exposure uniformity, and individual biological responses. Bioindicators are biological responses or markers that help assess the severity and effects of radiation exposure on an individual. Bioindicators can include physical symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, or laboratory tests such as changes in blood cell counts and gene expression that can help in assessing and treating exposed individuals. Additionally, early prodromal symptoms such as vomiting, diarrhea, and erythema can provide important clues for diagnosis and treatment. Developing a comprehensive plan for radiation emergencies is vital for safeguarding public health, infrastructure, and the environment.First responders play a critical role in establishing safety perimeters, triage, and coordination with various stakeholders. Education and training are essential for medical personnel and the public. This article provides general recommendations and identifies challenges to effective radiation emergency preparedness and response.

show abstract

Assessment of radiation safety culture among radiological technologists in medical imaging departments in Saudi Arabia

Shubayr,

Muawwadhah,

Shami

et al. 2024

Radioprotection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the perception of radiation safety culture among medical radiological technologists (MRTs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study was performed from June 2022 to February 2023 and involved MRTs from various hospitals and medical centres in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered and previously validated radiation safety culture survey instrument in medical imaging departments. The survey comprises 11 determinants of radiation safety culture, including personal accountability, teamwork in imaging, teamwork across imaging stakeholders, questioning attitude, feedback loops, organisational learning, leadership actions, non-punitive response, error reporting, radiation policy and overall perception of radiation safety. A total of 496 MRTs participated in this study. Results showed that most of the MRTs were male (75.0%), between 25 and 44 yr old (71.0%), with a bachelor’s degree (53.2%) and had less than 5 yr of experience (41.1%). The highest mean scores were for personal accountability (4.43 ± 0.62) and teamwork in imaging (4.22 ± 0.91), while the lowest mean score was for non-punitive response (2.94 ± 1.01). The majority of the MRTs reported good perception for the personal accountability (71.8%), teamwork in imaging (56.5%) and organisational learning (46%) scales; moderate perception for the teamwork across imaging stakeholders (53.2%), questioning attitude (71%), feedback loops (47.6%), leadership actions (74.2%), error reporting (53.2%), radiation policy (54.8%) and overall perception of radiation safety (62.1%) scales; and poor perception for the non-punitive response scale (45.2%). Individual and organisational interference are warranted to adhere to a strong radiation safety culture with continuing education. Moreover, repeated measures are necessary to assess for categorical improvement associated with the relevant determinants that are also important to support a positive radiation safety culture.

show abstract

Survey on impact of regulations on radiation safety and development of radiation safety culture in 25 countries

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Investigation of radiation protection and safety measures in Rwandan public hospitals: Readiness for the implementation of the new regulations

Investigation of radiation protection and safety measures in Rwandan public hospitals: Readiness for the implementation of the new regulations

An Overview of Appropriate Medical Practice and Preparedness in Radiation Emergency Response

Assessment of radiation safety culture among radiological technologists in medical imaging departments in Saudi Arabia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About