2019
DOI: 10.15407/animbiol21.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey on the course of puerperium and on fertility after implementation of the iVET® birth monitoring system in heifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our evaluation of the calving ease showed that 79.2% of the animals with a calving ease score 3 showed severe injuries of the soft birth canal. Additionally, animals with a retention time of the iVet ® -sensor of more than 24 h needed severe calving assistance statistically significantly more often [ 13 ]. To our knowledge, to date, only a few studies have dealt with injuries after dystocia in heifers in detail, even though it is well known that heifers often require assistance at calving [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our evaluation of the calving ease showed that 79.2% of the animals with a calving ease score 3 showed severe injuries of the soft birth canal. Additionally, animals with a retention time of the iVet ® -sensor of more than 24 h needed severe calving assistance statistically significantly more often [ 13 ]. To our knowledge, to date, only a few studies have dealt with injuries after dystocia in heifers in detail, even though it is well known that heifers often require assistance at calving [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the iVet ® -sensor was an important risk factor for infections of the uterus, because animals with a retention time of the sensor of more than 24 h developed significantly more often retained fetal membranes, metritis at day 10 p.p., and endometritis at day 21 p.p. [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also two types of intravaginal sensors: namely physical (light) and temperature sensors. Each of them has to be inserted aseptically into the vagina until contact with the external cervical os by a gloved hand [ 94 , 100 ] or a vaginal applicator [ 56 , 57 , 61 ].…”
Section: Detection Of the Expulsion Of Sensors During Appearing Allan...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the intravaginal device remained inside the vaginal canal for two consecutive weeks, Palombi et al [ 94 ] observed no adverse effects, and the animals did not exhibit any discomfort or vaginal discharge. In contrast, Henningsen et al [ 98 ] and Marien et al [ 100 ] reported that the iVET ® birth monitoring system caused a significantly higher number of injuries and extreme calving difficulties. The injuries were more severe, the healing progressed more slowly, and these animals developed endometritis significantly more frequently than the control group.…”
Section: Detection Of the Expulsion Of Sensors During Appearing Allan...mentioning
confidence: 99%