2017 International Conference on Recent Innovations in Signal Processing and Embedded Systems (RISE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/rise.2017.8378225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey on website evaluation tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24], Khandare et al evaluated the usability of an engineering college website using three automated tools namely: Website Grader, SEOptimer and Qualidator. The authors in [25] also used Website Grader to evaluate websites in context of tourism field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], Khandare et al evaluated the usability of an engineering college website using three automated tools namely: Website Grader, SEOptimer and Qualidator. The authors in [25] also used Website Grader to evaluate websites in context of tourism field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, designers may evaluate their websites based on users' evaluation, i.e., users testing tool. User testing enables web content designers to identify issues and rectify them based on real users' perspectives (Khandare et al, 2017). For a typical language learning website, the designers must ensure that they test the website's usability for the population that will be using it; these users are often second language learners.…”
Section: B Approaches To Evaluating English Language Learning Websitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a typical language learning website, the designers must ensure that they test the website's usability for the population that will be using it; these users are often second language learners. Khandare et al (2017) assert that user testing as a form of evaluation must be determined by users rather than developers. They posit that digital resources are not purposely used by the developers but rather by a vast number of language learners whose interest is imperative (Khandare et al, 2017).…”
Section: B Approaches To Evaluating English Language Learning Websitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Business websites should be evaluated periodically, but most companies have limited experience in developing and maintaining their websites in highly dynamic environments (Al-Omar, 2017b; Al-Omar, 2017a; Konidaris and Koustoumpardi, 2018; Deedam et al , 2018; Bollen et al , 2008). Using automated website evaluation tools could help website designers to improve their websites to international standards (Khandare et al , 2017). Past research also suggests future studies to compare website quality in several industries (Konidaris and Koustoumpardi, 2018; Truong and Bhuiyan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%