EFTA 2003. 2003 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8696)
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2003.1247753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey on wireless sensor network devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
139
1
10

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
139
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The rise of cheap mobile telephony has driven down the costs of 32-bit processors (especially those based around the ARM architecture (Furber, 1996)), and this is increasingly creating lower cost microcontrollers and System-on-Chip (SoC) devices based on ARM. However, there are still many IoT devices built on 8-bit processors, and occasionally, 16-bit (Vieira et al, 2003). In particular the open source hardware platform Arduino (Arduino, 2015) supports both 8-bit and 32-bit controllers, but the 8-bit controllers remain considerably cheaper and at the time of writing are still widely used.…”
Section: Device and Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise of cheap mobile telephony has driven down the costs of 32-bit processors (especially those based around the ARM architecture (Furber, 1996)), and this is increasingly creating lower cost microcontrollers and System-on-Chip (SoC) devices based on ARM. However, there are still many IoT devices built on 8-bit processors, and occasionally, 16-bit (Vieira et al, 2003). In particular the open source hardware platform Arduino (Arduino, 2015) supports both 8-bit and 32-bit controllers, but the 8-bit controllers remain considerably cheaper and at the time of writing are still widely used.…”
Section: Device and Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other well-known approaches involves letting the sensor data influence a digital pulse train of which we easily can measure parameters like frequency, pulse width or duty cycle. None of these approaches put the power consumption of the sensor into focus [12] because it is assumed that energy is not a limiting factor and that all data should be transferred to some computational stage at the WSN/IoT node or any device higher up in the system architecture.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision agriculture is very much useful in improving the efficiency of performance of agricultural land and also increases the quality and reliability in spite of the ruggedness in the environment [4]. The effect over the growth of crops due to the presence of obstacles in the internode's communication is compared with the performance of sensor node in the greenhouse environment running with low power operation by Hyun-Joong Kang [5]. The existing wireless sensor networks like ZigBee, Bluetooth and WiFi are operated with 2.4 GHz Industrial Specific and Medical (ISM) band which are applicable for modern precision agriculture [6] [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%