2001
DOI: 10.1108/02630800110406658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveyor variability in large‐scale house condition surveys

Abstract: Deals with surveyor variability, in terms of identifying defects, when undertaking surveys of residential properties. It is based on a sample of 38 surveyors who took part in a large‐scale house condition survey (LSHCS). Seeks to quantify the extent of the variability of surveyors in LSHCS, and proposes methods to try to reduce the incidence of variability. Discusses not only the variability of surveyors in identifying defects to building elements, but also their perceptions of lifetimes for building elements.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important that they bear this in mind when drawing up work plans and budgets. Kempton et al (2001) recommend that one potential approach to reducing surveyor variability is to increase objectivity by developing mechanisms for assessing individual surveyor variable tendencies. Kempton (2004) suggests that data collected from stock condition surveys should be treated with a full awareness of the potential variability that it may contain.…”
Section: Role Of Stock Condition Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that they bear this in mind when drawing up work plans and budgets. Kempton et al (2001) recommend that one potential approach to reducing surveyor variability is to increase objectivity by developing mechanisms for assessing individual surveyor variable tendencies. Kempton (2004) suggests that data collected from stock condition surveys should be treated with a full awareness of the potential variability that it may contain.…”
Section: Role Of Stock Condition Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual observation, manual reporting and interpretation have been shown to have drawbacks (Kempton et al, 2001;Menches et al, 2008;Phares et al, 2001). First, important details can be missed, misinterpreted, or field measurements and calculations can be incorrect during the inspection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some factors affecting the detailing and thoroughness of the inspection and the reports are safety concerns of the inspectors, experience and training, and time constraints. Finally, interpretation of the reports and overall results of the inspection can vary (Kempton et al, 2001;Menches et al, 2008;Phares et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The practice of condition assessment by building inspectors yields variable results due to subjective perceptions of the inspectors Surveyor variability is defined as the situation where two or more surveyors surveying the same building, arrive at very different survey decisions [12] and [13]. PWD has developed the standard Guideline Condition Assessment of building components including services in a year 2013.…”
Section: Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%