2007
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival advantage with decitabine versus intensive chemotherapy in patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Abstract: BACKGROUNDDecitabine, a hypomethylating agent, is active and has been approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Intensive chemotherapy is an accepted form of therapy for patients with higher risk MDS. The comparative efficacy of these 2 forms of treatment in MDS is unknown. The objective of the current study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of decitabine and intensive chemotherapy in MDS.METHODSThe authors compared lower intensity decitab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
95
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
95
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Overall survival of responders and non-responders survival, respectively; P=.047) as well as a favorable response duration of 64 weeks. The observed median overall survival of 74 weeks in the group of responding patients corresponds well with the survival rates from the randomized phase II/III trials published for 5-AZA as well as decitabine [8,10,13,14,19], most of which had a higher number of treatment cycles. Therefore, our results suggest that even a limited number of treatment cycles may be beneficial for patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 Overall survival of responders and non-responders survival, respectively; P=.047) as well as a favorable response duration of 64 weeks. The observed median overall survival of 74 weeks in the group of responding patients corresponds well with the survival rates from the randomized phase II/III trials published for 5-AZA as well as decitabine [8,10,13,14,19], most of which had a higher number of treatment cycles. Therefore, our results suggest that even a limited number of treatment cycles may be beneficial for patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For responding patients, the median time to AML progression was 45 weeks (95% CI 22-68), while the median time to AML in non-responders was 14 weeks (95% CI [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This difference was significant (P=0.038).…”
Section: Time To Aml and Overall Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sixteen of the identified trials were excluded for various reasons (Figure 1). 5,8,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Of the five publications considered relevant for the meta-analysis, two reported different outcomes on the same trial, of which only one was relevant. Thus, four trials including 952 patients and performed between the years 2002 and 2008 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Recently, a pilot study analyzed the outcomes of 12 patients with MDS with a median age of 58 years who received decitabine before undergoing an allo-HCT with MRD, matched unrelated donors (MUD) or umbilical cord blood (UCB) grafts. After a median follow-up of 11 months, 8 patients are in CR.…”
Section: Upfront Transplantation Induction or Low-intensity Therapy mentioning
confidence: 99%