2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival after biventricular mechanical circulatory support: Does the type of device matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other groups have similarly stressed the low risk of thromboembolism in patients supported with the SynCardia t-TAH [10,12]. Furthermore, the recent report from the GRAM registry showed that SynCardia t-TAH recipients experienced significantly fewer neurologic events than BiVAD recipients [15]. This might be related to the nearly complete removal of the native heart cavities, the lack of inflow grafts, and the use of short, large diameter outflow grafts in CardioWest TAH recipients.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other groups have similarly stressed the low risk of thromboembolism in patients supported with the SynCardia t-TAH [10,12]. Furthermore, the recent report from the GRAM registry showed that SynCardia t-TAH recipients experienced significantly fewer neurologic events than BiVAD recipients [15]. This might be related to the nearly complete removal of the native heart cavities, the lack of inflow grafts, and the use of short, large diameter outflow grafts in CardioWest TAH recipients.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among the various devices available to support patients with biventricular failure, the SynCardia t-TAH is used less frequently than paracorporeal BiVADs. Thus, according to the latest INTERMACS [14] and the French GRAM Registry [15] reports, the SynCardia t-TAH was used, respectively, in 21% (99 of 467) and in 24% (90 of 383) of patients requiring biventricular support. Data comparing outcomes with various biventricular support devices are scarce.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a larger patient group presenting with different comorbidity and clinical characteristics is needed to assess the suitability of Freedom driver along with CW-TAH for destination therapy. However, the pneumatic drivelines passing through the skin to the exterior to deliver and withdraw driving compressed air to the implanted moving diaphragms were reported as a source of infection in one-third of the patients in the study by Torregrossa et al A French study also reported the same findings in the patients supported for more than a year [12]. These data highlight the need for maintaining a high suspicion for infections in patients supported for the long term on a SynCardia TAH besides developing new systems to power implanted driving units which are fully operational without interruption of skin barriers in order to decrease the risk of infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although LVAD has established itself as a successful BTT, but in cardiac pathologies where LVAD is contraindicated, including biventricular failure, intractable arrhythmias, irreparable ventricular anatomical defects, mechanical prosthetic valve replacement, and cardiac neoplasms, the dominance of TAH over LVAD is undisputable. Moreover, the design of TAH offers several advantages relative to present continuous flow LVADs, like reduced thrombosis and stroke rates, reduced after load and preload sensitivity, and a reduction in device-induced bleeding [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Among patients with advanced heart failure, those with biventricular failure have the worst prognosis and very few available options while waiting for a compatible donor. They are usually more fragile preoperatively, with more comorbidities, including renal and hepatic dysfunction, than patients receiving sole left ventricular support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%