2019
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1616816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival after local excision for rectal cancer: a population-based overview of clinical practice and outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study did not focus on survival outcomes. This was previously addressed by our study group [24]. Finally, there is no consensus on the specified time interval for when to still define additional surgery as 'completion surgery' or when to define it as 'salvage surgery' [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study did not focus on survival outcomes. This was previously addressed by our study group [24]. Finally, there is no consensus on the specified time interval for when to still define additional surgery as 'completion surgery' or when to define it as 'salvage surgery' [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If a suspected T1 rectal cancer proves to be a T2 or more invasive carcinoma after LE, cTME is recommended, leading to similar oncological results as primary TME surgery [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimen was retracted entirely by retraction stitches and excised in MITAS LE, resulting in an en bloc resection rate of 100%. R0 resection was performed in 50%-81.1% of patients undergoing conventional LE [34][35][36] and 80%-90% of those undergoing TEMS [34,35]. The R0 resection rate varied from 74.6% to 89% in patients undergoing ESD [31,33] and 93% in those undergoing TAMIS [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%