2017
DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-16-00499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in elderly patients

Abstract: In the DES era, elderly patients (≥75 years) derive a similar survival benefit from successful CTO PCI to younger patients. These findings suggest that CTO PCI, when indicated, should not be withheld from the elderly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the ACEF score-the strongest factor associated with cardiac mortality in our study-has been used to stratify risk and predict clinical outcomes in patients who underwent elective PCI on non-occlusive coronary stenoses. 21,22 However, Di Serafino et al 23 showed that the ACEF score could be used as a simple tool to predict clinical outcomes in patients treated with CTO-PCI, as observed in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, the ACEF score-the strongest factor associated with cardiac mortality in our study-has been used to stratify risk and predict clinical outcomes in patients who underwent elective PCI on non-occlusive coronary stenoses. 21,22 However, Di Serafino et al 23 showed that the ACEF score could be used as a simple tool to predict clinical outcomes in patients treated with CTO-PCI, as observed in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Hoebers et al were also unable to show a significant association between successful CTO‐PCI and mortality (at a median follow‐up of about 30 months), although the number of older CTO patients in their study was small. On the other hand, Toma et al demonstrated that successful CTO‐PCI was significantly associated with improved survival in both older and younger patients. In our patient cohort, regardless of their age, both cardiac and all‐cause mortality were significantly higher in the MT group compared to those who underwent revascularization, but this survival benefit with revascularization was especially notable in older patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the elderly, 61% of patients were males (n = 839) while 39% (n = 549) were females. The BMI reported by only three studies [7,10,14] was higher in younger patients and showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) between the two cohorts in these studies. In terms of past medical history, both the groups had a similar history of prior MI (38% in each group), whereas the higher prevalence of stroke was noted in the older age group [15% (n = 89) vs. 10% (n = 262)].…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A total of seven studies were included with 7671 patients [7][8][9][10][11][12]14]. Two studies were prospective and five were retrospective.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Более того, успешная реваскуляризация ХОКА приводит к снижению потребности в АКШ и может улучшать отдаленную выживаемость пациентов по сравнению с безуспешной ЧКВ на ХОКА [28,31]. Положительный эффект от успешного открытия ХОКА был также продемонстрирован в более старшей группе пациентов (>75 лет) с высокой коморбидностью [33].…”
Section: роль реканализации хока у пациентов со стабильной ибсunclassified