2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00126-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
89
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
89
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of radiation therapy seen in Norway is in line with the conclusion of the randomised PORTEC-1 trial 218 and ASTEC-radiation trial 182 The trend of adding chemotherapy for 9% of the Norwegian patients during the last decennium (Paper IV) and 18% of the MoMaTEC patients (Paper II and IV) thus seems to be in line with this recently developed knowledge.…”
Section: Treatment Strategies Over Timesupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduction of radiation therapy seen in Norway is in line with the conclusion of the randomised PORTEC-1 trial 218 and ASTEC-radiation trial 182 The trend of adding chemotherapy for 9% of the Norwegian patients during the last decennium (Paper IV) and 18% of the MoMaTEC patients (Paper II and IV) thus seems to be in line with this recently developed knowledge.…”
Section: Treatment Strategies Over Timesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Also, randomized studies reporting no survival benefit from radiotherapy may have influenced the change in treatment strategy seen over time. 182,218 In line with our 30-year perspective form Norway (Paper V), there has been an increased survival in Europe: 5-years survival has increased from 76% to 79% during 2005-2009 219 ; also a similar trend was found in Britain. 220 In contrast, a SEER study has noticed an opposite trend: worse survival of their population during 1988-2001.…”
Section: Treatment Strategies Over Timesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar to our study, they found fewer complications without compromise of survival outcomes in those undergoing minimally invasive versus laparotomy staging. Although our median follow-up for the robotic group was shorter, 60% of recurrences of endometrial cancer occur within 2 years, so we feel we have captured a majority of those destined to recur [19]. Based on our study, the studies by Lau et al and Fader et al, and the GOG LAP2 study, it is increasingly apparent that the initial concerns regarding an increased risk of recurrent cancer for patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures were unfounded, and that there are clear benefits with MIS in terms of operative morbidity and length of stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is no economic or clinical justification for the routine use of the Pap smear and systematic radiography in the follow-up of patients with endometrial carcinoma [144, 145]. Centers advocating surveillance should focus on the detection of potentially curable vaginal recurrences, since isolated vaginal-vault recurrence of endometrial carcinoma is curable in up to 87% of cases, in patients previously not exposed to radiation [146]. …”
Section: Prevention and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%