2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2015.12.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival analysis approach to account for non-exponential decay rate effects in lifetime experiments

Abstract: In experiments that measure the lifetime of trapped particles, in addition to loss mechanisms with exponential survival probability functions, particles can be lost by mechanisms with non-exponential survival probability functions. Failure to account for such loss mechanisms produces systematic measurement error and associated systematic uncertainties in these measurements. In this work, we develop a general competing risks survival analysis method to account for the joint effect of loss mechanisms with either… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of poor cleaning was studied in the NIST trap [44][45][46]. The cleaning technique used was ramping down the radial magnetic field temporarily so that abovethreshold UCNs collide with material on the trap sidewall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of poor cleaning was studied in the NIST trap [44][45][46]. The cleaning technique used was ramping down the radial magnetic field temporarily so that abovethreshold UCNs collide with material on the trap sidewall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cleaning technique used was ramping down the radial magnetic field temporarily so that abovethreshold UCNs collide with material on the trap sidewall. Detailed simulations show ramping to 30% of the initial field is required to ensure above-threshold UCNs are sufficiently cleaned from the trap (to reduce the storage time shift to < 1 s), but this reduces the initial number of well-trapped UCNs (E tot < U trap ) to 30% [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%