2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4615-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival analysis of 287 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients in a single institution: a retrospective comparison of two consecutive time intervals with surgical and conservative treatment approaches

Abstract: This study is a retrospective analysis of clinico-pathological data to investigate survival rates of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with different modalities in a single academic head and neck cancer center in different time intervals. Altogether, 287 patients with OPSCC were included in this comparison. Patients were analysed during two different treatment periods: Group 1 included patients treated mainly with primary surgery ± adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy between 2002 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported, patient age (defined by < 55 and ≥ 55 years) is a significant factor in DFS and OS, but only for p16-positive patients in this cohort of patients (p < 0.0001). These findings are similar to those reported by others, although with different cutoffs amongst studies [6,[29][30][31][32][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. The majority of patients were white (88.7%), although black patients disproportionately had p16-negative tumors (50%) when compared to white patients (9%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As previously reported, patient age (defined by < 55 and ≥ 55 years) is a significant factor in DFS and OS, but only for p16-positive patients in this cohort of patients (p < 0.0001). These findings are similar to those reported by others, although with different cutoffs amongst studies [6,[29][30][31][32][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. The majority of patients were white (88.7%), although black patients disproportionately had p16-negative tumors (50%) when compared to white patients (9%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Reported 5-year overall survival for p16-positive OPSCC ranges from 60 to 94% for all comers [4,5,[29][30][31][32]. Disease free or progression free survival ranges from 57 to 85% [5,[30][31][32]. In this study, recurrence occurred in 86 (22%) patients with 47 (12%) patients experiencing locoregional disease and 58 (15%) with distant metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Majority of the literature comparing surgical and nonsurgical modalities are retrospective. Münscher et al 16 addressed this question by comparing survival outcomes for patients with OPSCC from different time periods, reflecting the predominance of one treatment approach over the other. Before 2007, the majority of the patients were treated by surgery followed by adjuvant treatment and their outcomes with regard to OS and DFS remained unchanged from the patients treated after 2007 mostly by nonsurgical modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several other studies have indicated a survival advantage in patients who underwent surgical treatment, even when considering their HPV status(Rades et al, 2011;Karatzanis et al, 2012;Kamran et al, 2018). However, the interpretation of results concerning the impact of HPV status on survival has been a subject of controversy(Münscher et al, 2017).Münscher et al conducted a study that suggested the HPV status may not have a significant influence on survival(Münscher et al, 2017). Further research is needed to evaluate the outcome of OPSCC in patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral neck dissection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%