Survival analysis of dental implants and implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer patients up to 20 years

Doll, Christian; Nack, Claudia; Raguse, Jan-Dirk; Stricker, Andres; Duttenhoefer, Fabian; Nelson, Katja; Nahles, Susanne

doi:10.1007/s00784-014-1359-2

Cited by 38 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…oral cancer: cumulative survival rate after 20 years 90.8%). 3 Despite the high survival rates and intensive periodontal and prosthetical maintenance over time, implant failures may occur. 4,5,6 In the last decades, evidence on the presence of peri-implant inflammations affecting both soft and hard tissues that may eventually lead to implant failure (loss) has substantially increased.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of peri-implant diseases – a critical review on the current evidence

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this paper was to evaluate the current evidence reporting on the prevalence of peri-implantitis and to determine the influencing factors. An electronic search for articles published until February 2019 reporting on the prevalence of peri-implantitis was performed in MEDLINE. Included criteria were published in international peer-reviewed journals, written in English language, reported on the prevalence of peri-implantitis, included implants with a minimum follow-up of one year after functional loading and used a clear definition for peri-implantitis and/or peri-implant mucositis with a clear cutoff for bone level changes according to the case definitions of Sanz and Chapple and Berglundh et al. 2018. Included papers were anaylized for factors affecting the reported prevalences for peri-implantitis. Twenty-five papers were included in the present review and a wide range for the reported prevalence of peri-implantitis was seen. Case definitions for peri-implantitis with various thresholds for bone loss together with the type of reporting on patient-or implant-level were the most significant factors that lead to a large variety of the occurrence of the disease. Additionally, follow-up time and the evaluation in a certain "convenience" population may have influenced the prevalence values. In conclusion, it can be stated that a wide range for reporting the prevalence of peri-implantitis can be found and no real estimation of the global burden of the disease can be made. Applying accurate case definitions for peri-implantitis is the most important factor for reporting the prevalence and should be strictly followed in future reports.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of peri-implant diseases – a critical review on the current evidence

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The reconstruction of lost tissues (skin-fascial-muscle flap, bone reconstruction) is the optimal approach to the management of patients after cancer surgery within the head and neck region [ 25 – 30 ]. In our study, a low percentage of prosthetic rehabilitation of patients who underwent reconstruction (6.73% of the maxilla and 21.61% of the mandible) was due to a considerably advanced disease, the extent of the neoplastic process, and the burden of supplementary treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the group of patients after reconstruction, some possible complications associated with infections, radiotherapy, and recurrent neoplasm should be considered, as they may lead to resorption and implant loss [ 28 ]. Despite these complications, the reconstruction of lost tissues with autogenic graft is the first choice for more cases of reconstruction and dental implant-supported oral rehabilitation is most frequently considered [ 26 , 30 , 31 ]. Unfortunately, grafted bone combined with radiotherapy is defined as a negative prognostic factor of implant survival [ 32 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Management of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Maxillofacial Tumors

Rolski

Kostrzewa-Janicka

Zawadzki

et al. 2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Morphological and functional disturbances induced by postsurgical defects and loss of tissues in the stomatognathic system due to the treatment of tumors in the maxillofacial region determine the therapeutic needs of patients. The study aimed at clinical and epidemiological evaluation of patients under prosthetic treatment in order to establish the algorithm for rehabilitation. The study group was composed of the patients after midface surgery (45.74%); surgery in a lower part of the face (47.38%); mixed postoperative losses (3.44%); loss of face tissues and surgery in other locations in the head and neck region (3.44%). The supplementary treatment was applied in 69.63% of patients. Clinical and additional examinations were performed to obtain the picture of postoperative loss, its magnitude, and location to plan the strategy of prosthetic rehabilitation. The management algorithm for prosthetic rehabilitation in patients after surgical treatment of maxillofacial neoplasms was based on its division in stages. The location and magnitude of postoperative losses, as well as the implementation of supplementary treatment of the patients after treatment of maxillofacial tumors, influence the planning of prosthetic rehabilitation that plays a key role and facilitates the patients' return to their prior living situation, occupational and family lives.

show abstract

“…Placement of endosseous dental implants can be complicated by inadequate bone volume resulting from tooth loss, periodontal disease, trauma, or pathosis 1,2,3 . In such cases, bone or bone substitutes are often used to augment deficient alveolar bone 4 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of deproteinized bone mineral (DBM) as an onlay bone-graft in the rabbit mandible

Al-Jandan

Al-Harkan

Pompura

et al. 2015

The Saudi Journal for Dental Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate bone regeneration in a heterogenous, deproteinized bone mineral (DBM) when used as an onlay graft. Materials and methods: In this study, eight rabbits received two titanium bone graft holders (TBGHs), one on the left and one on the right lateral surface of the mandible. Each TBGH possessed two cylindrical chambers, which were perforated with numerous sub-millimeter pores. On

show abstract

Survival analysis of dental implants and implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer patients up to 20 years

Abstract: Dental implants in oral cancer patients who had been treated by ablative surgery show a high and steady cumulative survival rate after 11 years. Implant survival of patients with additional RCT is significantly lower. Non-smoking-irradiated patients seem to have a better implant survival.

Cited by 38 publications

References 14 publications

Prevalence of peri-implant diseases – a critical review on the current evidence

Prevalence of peri-implant diseases – a critical review on the current evidence

The Management of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Maxillofacial Tumors

Evaluation of deproteinized bone mineral (DBM) as an onlay bone-graft in the rabbit mandible

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About