Survival Analysis of Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns with and Without Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background: Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns (PZCs) are increasingly preferred for restoring primary teeth due to their esthetic appeal and retention. However, their rigid, unmodifiable design requires precise tooth preparation, often leading to aggressive reduction and potential pulp exposure. Pulpotomy, a standard treatment for reversible pulpitis and mechanical pulp exposure, is sometimes employed before PZCs. While pulpotomy is not routinely performed, its use raises important considerations about the interplay between restorative procedures and pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry, particularly regarding the long-term restoration outcomes of PZCs. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of pulpotomy on the success rate of PZCs. Methods: We examined 81 anterior upper primary teeth treated with PZCs in children aged 2–5 years over a two-year period. Cases were divided into groups with and without pulpotomy. Follow-ups occurred at 6-month intervals, assessing clinical and radiographic outcomes. Analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 software. The statistical significance was p < 0.05. Results: A total of 81 anterior primary teeth were included. Chi-square analysis showed no association between pulp therapy and PZC success (χ2 = 0.051, p = 0.822). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed comparable survival curves and the log-rank test showed no statistically significant difference in survival time between pulpotomy-treated and untreated groups (χ2 = 0.051, p = 0.821). Conclusions: Pulpotomy did not significantly affect the success rate of PZCs within 2 years.