2003
DOI: 10.1139/w03-051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and colonization of rhizobacteria in a tomato transplant system

Abstract: Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are used on crops most often as seed treatments; however, an alternative application method for transplanted vegetables is mixing PGPR into the soilless medium in which the transplants are grown. Studies were undertaken to compare root colonization and persistence of rifampicin-resistant mutants of PGPR strains Bacillus pumilus SE34 and Pseudomonas fluorescens 89B61, SE34r and 89B61r, on tomato as a function of application method. When the bacteria were incorporated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported for the colonization of tomato plants by P. fluorescens SE34r (70). The differences between stem and leaf populations that were observed can be explained by accumulation of bacterial cells in the leaf, which can be considered a sink, whereas the stem serves only for transition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar results were reported for the colonization of tomato plants by P. fluorescens SE34r (70). The differences between stem and leaf populations that were observed can be explained by accumulation of bacterial cells in the leaf, which can be considered a sink, whereas the stem serves only for transition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, inoculants must overcome two major problems inherent to living microorganisms: (1) loss of viability during short storage in the grower's warehouse, and (2) long shelf life and stability of the product over a range of −5 to 30°C, within growers' storage conditions. Anith et al 2004;Bacilio et al 2003Bacilio et al , 2004Bashan et al 2006;Boruah and Kumar 2002;Cakmakci et al 2001Cakmakci et al , 2006Carrillo-Garcia et al 2000;Dominguez-Nuñez et al 2012;Egamberdiyeva 2007;Esitken et al 2003;Fürnkranz et al 2012;Guetsky et al 2002a, b;Guiñazú et al 2010;Hossain and Mårtensson 2008;Jetiyanon et al 2003;Khan et al 2003;Kurek and Jaroszuk-Ściseł 2002;Landa et al 2001;Lopez et al 2013;Madhaiyan et al 2010;Mehnaz et al 2010;Odee et al 2002;Ozturk et al 2003;Puente et al 2004aPuente et al , b, 2009aRajapaksha et al 2011;Singh et al 2011;Sigler et al 2001;Sudhakar et al 2000;Yan et al 2003;Yu et al 2011;Zafar et al 2012 Liquid (culture media or water) Clayton et al 2004a, b;Hamaoui et al 2001;Hungria et al 2010; Bashan et al 2002a, b;deBashan et al 2004;…”
Section: Characteristics Of a Carrier For Inoculants; The Ideal Inocumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil samples were shaken at 150 rpm for 1 h and a suspension of 1 ml was taken from each flask for serial tenfold dilutions and plating in TSA plates. The samples were plated in triplicates and incubated at 28°C for 48 h (Yan et al 2003). …”
Section: Enumeration Of Bacterial Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%