“…The difference in herd density is striking: at GIWA it is approximately 0.04 elk per hectare (140 elk on 3,450 ha), while herd density at PRNS is at least 0.38 elk per hectare (.400 elk on 1,040 ha; Manning et al, 2003). In addition to a higher herd density, continued herd infection with clinically affected animals and the subsequent increased environmental fecal contamination as well as specific environmental factors at PRNS, such as lower mean daily temperature (11.4 C vs. 16.1 C), higher annual mean precipitation (95.2 cm vs. 48.9 cm), and acidic soil (pH56.0 at PRNS), may facilitate survival of MAP in the environment (Gogan et al, 1989;Manning and Collins, 2001;Hoar, 2002;Whittington et al, 2004). Furthermore, elk at PRNS, unlike elk at GIWA, have shown clinical and biological evidence of copper deficiency, associated with decreased immunocompetency in ruminants, which may predispose the PRNS herd to clinical paratuberculosis (Gogan et al, 1989;Stabel and Spears, 1989).…”