2014
DOI: 10.1186/2162-3619-3-10
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and hospitalization among patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with azacitidine or decitabine in a large managed care population: a real-world, retrospective, claims-based, comparative analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThis study examined patient outcomes using real world data for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients initiating treatment.MethodsA retrospective, administrative claims-based, comparative analysis was developed to study outcomes for AML patients initiating treatment with decitabine or azacitidine between January 2006 and June 2012.ResultsTreatment with azacitidine was associated with a longer median overall survival (10.1 versus 6.9 mos., p = 0.007) and a lower risk of hospitalization (HR 0.787, p = 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the median OS in our study appears short in comparison with that reported by Fenaux et al from the comparison of azacitidine and BSC only (median, 19.1 vs 13.4 months), the studies are not directly comparable due to differences in the patient cohorts, as displayed by the OS of patients in the BSC arms [6]. The few retrospective studies that compared decitabine and azacitidine did not specifically assess the survival among patients with RAEBt and/or 20-30 % blasts [18][19][20][21][22]. Importantly, we also observed that the favorable impact of decitabine on the outcome of RAEBt patients was similar among various patient subgroups and significantly differed from that among RAEB patients.…”
Section: Survival In Subgroups Of Raebt Patientscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…While the median OS in our study appears short in comparison with that reported by Fenaux et al from the comparison of azacitidine and BSC only (median, 19.1 vs 13.4 months), the studies are not directly comparable due to differences in the patient cohorts, as displayed by the OS of patients in the BSC arms [6]. The few retrospective studies that compared decitabine and azacitidine did not specifically assess the survival among patients with RAEBt and/or 20-30 % blasts [18][19][20][21][22]. Importantly, we also observed that the favorable impact of decitabine on the outcome of RAEBt patients was similar among various patient subgroups and significantly differed from that among RAEB patients.…”
Section: Survival In Subgroups Of Raebt Patientscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…DNMT inhibitor 5‐aza‐dC has been approved by the National Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia . It is also tested in various clinical trials of cancer treatment, including breast cancer, liver cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigenetic silencing via methylation has been implicated in human cancer, including the development of hematopoietic malignancies. Irreversible DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, such as 5‐azacytidine and decitabine, seem to represent promising therapeutic options for myeloid malignancies, including AML (Szmigielska‐Kaplon and Robak, ; Muller‐Thomas et al, ; Smith et al, ). CHFR , localized to 12q24, has been reported to delay entry into mitosis at the G2 to M entry site, and has been proposed as a candidate tumor‐suppressor gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%