1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1368-8375(98)00113-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and patterns of recurrence in 200 oral cancer patients treated by radical surgery and neck dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
122
2
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
20
122
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported risk of local failure in the presence of close margins in patients with oral SCC has been variously reported between 8.6% and 80% [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] (Table 4). We continue to lack a standardized treatment protocol with regard to close margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported risk of local failure in the presence of close margins in patients with oral SCC has been variously reported between 8.6% and 80% [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] (Table 4). We continue to lack a standardized treatment protocol with regard to close margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the survival and prognostic factors of different anatomical sites are reported to differ. The 5-year survival rates fall between 40 to 60%, based on the site (Woolgar et al, 1999;Pericot et al, 2000). These rates are likely the result of multiple factors, including the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis, treatment modalities, and the site-specific morbidity associated with each treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia an overall survival rate of 83.3% has been reported (Chandu, 2005). In United Kingdom the 5-year overall survival was 64% (Woolgar et al, 1999). In India a survival rate of 30.5% has been reported (Yeole et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%