2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05341.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival from breast cancers managed by surgeons participating in the National Breast Cancer Audit of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

Abstract: These survivals are credible both overall and by clinical risk factor. Opportunities present to use these data for survival monitoring and to investigate survival by socio-demographic characteristic, treatment protocol, case volume and provider characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 95 (Roder et al, 2010). The National Breast Cancer Audit did not include residential postcode in its minimum data set throughout the study period.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Approximately 95 (Roder et al, 2010). The National Breast Cancer Audit did not include residential postcode in its minimum data set throughout the study period.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Breast Cancer Audit did not include residential postcode in its minimum data set throughout the study period. In this study we analysed data for 30,299 early invasive breast cancers diagnosed in Australian women and treated by mastectomy or complete local excision where residential postcode was recorded (Roder et al, 2010).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although breast cancers included in the Audit are not selected to be representative of all early breast cancers, their characteristics appear similar. The Audit database has shown, for example, similar survivals to those for early breast cancers recorded at a population level in New South Wales and the USA [Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data] (Roder et al, 2010(Roder et al, : 2011. In addition, differences in survival by conventional risk factors, such as tumour size, grade, nodal status and oestrogen receptor status, have accorded with differences expected from population-based data, which has added credibility to the Audit database (Roder et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%