1973
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197303)31:3<492::aid-cncr2820310302>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival in chronic myelogenous leukemia: Influence of treatment and extent of disease at diagnosis

Abstract: A retrospective study was conducted on the survival of 178 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia from January 1948 through December 1967. Through analysis of survival time, comparison has been made between a group of 50 patients treated with chemotherapy alone vs. a group of 84 patients treated with radiation therapy to the spleen and chemotherapy. No difference could be found in these two major therapeutic groups (median survival 31 months for both). Further analysis has been made to determine whether su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 In the same review, the median survival of patients with Ph negative, bcr/abl positive CML was 50 months, a survival similar to that reported for patients with Ph positive CML. [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] This finding provides further support for the notion that Ph negative, bcr/abl positive CML is indistinguishable biologically and clinically from Ph positive CML. 14,20,32,51,62 In patients with Ph negative CML, we 22 and others 16,24 have reported features that distinguished Ph negative CML from Ph positive CML: older age, male predominance, higher incidences of anemia and thrombocytopenia, low incidence of basophilia, and lower WBC counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…12 In the same review, the median survival of patients with Ph negative, bcr/abl positive CML was 50 months, a survival similar to that reported for patients with Ph positive CML. [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] This finding provides further support for the notion that Ph negative, bcr/abl positive CML is indistinguishable biologically and clinically from Ph positive CML. 14,20,32,51,62 In patients with Ph negative CML, we 22 and others 16,24 have reported features that distinguished Ph negative CML from Ph positive CML: older age, male predominance, higher incidences of anemia and thrombocytopenia, low incidence of basophilia, and lower WBC counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, in the pooled series patients presenting with an H b level higher than 10 g/dl survived slightly longer than the others. A relationship of H b to survival was suggested by Theologides (1972) and Jacquillat et a1 (1975), but not by Monfardini et al(1973). We attempted to include H b level in the panel ofprognostic factors, but the ensuing prognostic classification became less sharp.…”
Section: Propiostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'- 17 Several recent studies have analyzed the prognostic factors in Ph-positive CML resulting in statistical models that predict patients' o~t c o r n e .~~~~" Variables adverse for survival included, among others, old age, the presence of organomegaly, weight loss, anemia, thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis, and high blast or basophil counts in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. [2][3][4][5][6]10 Ph-negative CML represents only 10% to 15% of the total CML population. "-'8 A careful analysis of this entity has been hampered by its rarity and the small number Of patients referred to any single institution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%