BACKGROUND
Data are inconsistent on the association between body mass index
(BMI) at time of cancer diagnosis and prognosis. We used data from 22
clinical treatment trials to examine the association between BMI and
survival across multiple cancer types and stages.
METHODS
Trials with ≥5 years of follow-up were selected. Patients
with BMI<18.5kg/m2 were excluded. Within a disease,
analyses were limited to patients on similar treatment regimens. Variable
cutpoint analysis identified a BMI cutpoint that maximized differences in
survival. Multivariable Cox regression analyses compared survival between
patients with BMI above versus below the cutpoint, adjusting for age, race,
sex, and important disease-specific clinical prognostic factors.
RESULTS
A total of 11,724 patients from 22 trials were identified. Fourteen
analyses were performed by disease site and treatment regimen. A cutpoint of
BMI=25kg/m2 maximized survival differences. No statistically
significant trend across all 14 analyses was observed (mean HR=0.96, P=.06).
In no cancer/treatment combination was elevated BMI associated with an
increased risk of death; for some cancers there was a survival advantage for
higher BMI. In sex-stratified analyses, BMI≥25kg/m2 was
associated with better overall survival among men (HR=0.82; P=.003), but not
women (HR=1.04; P=.86). The association persisted when sex-specific cancers
were excluded, when treatment regimens were restricted to dose based on
body-surface area, and when early stage cancers were excluded.
CONCLUSION
The association between BMI and survival is not consistent across
cancer types and stages.
IMPACT
Our findings suggest that disease, stage, and gender specific body
size recommendations for cancer survivors may be warranted.