1987
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4320(87)90111-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of rabbit embryos after culture or culture/freezing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, excessive pressure generated during VS removing through NM pores could induce tension over embryo surface, generating also mechanical remodeling of the mucin coat. Thus, due to most of the damage during rabbit embryo cryopreservation occurred on the mucin coat without damaging the blastomeres [23], NM vitrified embryos has competent in vitro developmental rates. However, it fails significantly during in vivo development at term, where intact mucin coat is essential for implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, excessive pressure generated during VS removing through NM pores could induce tension over embryo surface, generating also mechanical remodeling of the mucin coat. Thus, due to most of the damage during rabbit embryo cryopreservation occurred on the mucin coat without damaging the blastomeres [23], NM vitrified embryos has competent in vitro developmental rates. However, it fails significantly during in vivo development at term, where intact mucin coat is essential for implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMORAG et al (1989) obtained high rates of in witro development after vitrification in later stages (morula and blastocyst) and reduced viability in 1 to 2-cell embryos. This effect was initially related to reduced thickness of mucine layer in early stages of rabbit embryos due to a thickness-related protector effect of the layer (TECHAKUMPHU et al, 1987;SMORAG et al, 1989). However, rabbit morulae without a mucine layer developed in witro after vitrification, though intact morulae showed higher developmental rate (KASAI et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, mammalian embryos cultured in vitro have been said to exhibit slower embryonic development than those developed in the uterus, resulting in a lowering of their viability (Smorag & Gajda, 1991). This has been used to explain a reduced ability of cultured embryos to survive cryopreservation (Techakumphu et al, 1987). The total cell number in pig blastocysts cultured in vitro was smaller than in those recovered from the uterus (Papaioannou & Ebert, 1986); the number of inner cell mass (ICM) cells and their proportion in bovine blastocysts fertilised and cultured in vitro were lower than in those fertilised in vivo (Iwasaki et al, 1990); and the cell number of mouse blastocysts transferred to mouse uteri increased more rapidly than did the cell number in embryos cultured in vitro (Bowman & McLaren, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%