2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1752124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of the Richest? Social Status, Fertility, and Social Mobility in England 1541-1824

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Clark (2007) showed that the number of surviving children was higher among wealthier people (at the time of their death) in preindustrial England, but these differences diminished well before the fertility transition (see also Clark and Cummins 2009, 2015). Similar findings have been made for France (Cummins 2013) and England using occupational data from family reconstitutions (Boberg-Fazlic et al 2011). There is also evidence from other contexts of low fertility in high-status groups in pre-transitional society (e.g., Sogner et al 1984; Schneider and Schneider 1996).…”
Section: Theory and Previous Researchsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similarly, Clark (2007) showed that the number of surviving children was higher among wealthier people (at the time of their death) in preindustrial England, but these differences diminished well before the fertility transition (see also Clark and Cummins 2009, 2015). Similar findings have been made for France (Cummins 2013) and England using occupational data from family reconstitutions (Boberg-Fazlic et al 2011). There is also evidence from other contexts of low fertility in high-status groups in pre-transitional society (e.g., Sogner et al 1984; Schneider and Schneider 1996).…”
Section: Theory and Previous Researchsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Clark and Hamilton (2006) found a substantial fertility-income gradient in pre-industrial England. This finding was echoed in work by Boberg-Fazlic et al (2011) who like Clark and Hamilton (2006) found a positive income-fertility relationship in pre-1800 England. Cinnirella et al (2013) showed how this mechanism operates in the short run, as families in pre-industrial England respond to short-term economic stress by increasing birth spacing thus lowering fertility.…”
Section: Theory and Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Earlier ages at marriage and decreased birth intervals from 1750 to 1850 led to a population boom that fueled the industrial labor force (Boberg-Fazlic, Sharp, & Weisdorf, 2011;Stevenson, 1993), but may have also increased the likelihood of maternal mortality. Earlier ages at marriage and decreased birth intervals from 1750 to 1850 led to a population boom that fueled the industrial labor force (Boberg-Fazlic, Sharp, & Weisdorf, 2011;Stevenson, 1993), but may have also increased the likelihood of maternal mortality.…”
Section: Sex and Age At Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%