2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2012.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of transplanted human neural stem cell line (ReNcell VM) into the rat brain with and without immunosuppression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our previous work, where we were able to observe therapeutic efficacy and stimulation of endogenous repair, we have stuck to this protocol and avoided immunosuppressive therapy, and thus possible potential effects on stroke progression and cell distribution [37]. Furthermore, our investigations where designed as a proof-of-concept study with a survival time of only 14 days, which is short compared to the 6 weeks used by, for example, Hovakimyan et al [36]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to our previous work, where we were able to observe therapeutic efficacy and stimulation of endogenous repair, we have stuck to this protocol and avoided immunosuppressive therapy, and thus possible potential effects on stroke progression and cell distribution [37]. Furthermore, our investigations where designed as a proof-of-concept study with a survival time of only 14 days, which is short compared to the 6 weeks used by, for example, Hovakimyan et al [36]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is a problem affecting all studies testing human stem cells in rodent systems; however, even allogeneic transplantation is being discussed as including the risk of immune rejection [35]. There are conflicting reports regarding the need for immunosuppressive therapy after xenograft stem-cell therapy for cell survival and differentiation, and it is still unclear whether ASCs, despite their immunomodulatory capacities, may elicit systemic immune reactions [36]. Similar to our previous work, where we were able to observe therapeutic efficacy and stimulation of endogenous repair, we have stuck to this protocol and avoided immunosuppressive therapy, and thus possible potential effects on stroke progression and cell distribution [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies show immunosuppression to increase xenograft (human to rat) survival qualitatively [29] and quantitatively [30], but allograft transplantation into the striatum was not affected between immune-deficient/immuno-competent mice [31] other than to favor neuron differentiation [32]. The brain is now no longer considered a completely immuno-privileged region there is a degree of immune privilege, and the immune response is a major consideration for cell therapy [33].…”
Section: Toxicity and Host Responsementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, it reduces the acquired immune response and promotes survival of grafted neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in the brain (Hovakimyan et al, 2012). CsA, however, inhibits the maturation of NPCs (Guo et al, 2007) and its long-term administration can cause nephrotoxicity, liver dysfunction and a compromised host (Burdmann et al, 2003;Grub et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%