1995
DOI: 10.13031/2013.25439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of Weed Seeds and Seed Pathogen Propagates in Composted Grass Seed Straw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2000, researchers reported pile moisture and temperatures of 60°C correlated well with loss of seed viability (Eghball and Lesoing 2000). Others found that internal pile temperatures greatly affected the survival of grass seeds and pathogens (Churchill et al 1995;Grundy et al 1998). These studies support the results of the current demonstration study.…”
Section: Temperature Rangessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In 2000, researchers reported pile moisture and temperatures of 60°C correlated well with loss of seed viability (Eghball and Lesoing 2000). Others found that internal pile temperatures greatly affected the survival of grass seeds and pathogens (Churchill et al 1995;Grundy et al 1998). These studies support the results of the current demonstration study.…”
Section: Temperature Rangessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Secondly, minimizing the period of stockpiling before composting would help increase the temperatures (>55°C) within the windrows, thus allowing a higher rate of decomposition and pasteurization to be achieved. As well as this, increasing the number of turns the compost windrows received (from four to five) would lengthen the period in which feedstock material was exposed to composting and subsequently reduce the percentage of viable plant material surviving the composting process (Churchill et al, 1995). In addition, an increase in the size of the compost windrows would raise internal temperatures as the windrow's surface area to volume ratio is reduced (Michel et al, 1996), however, the maximum potential size of the windrow may be limited by the size of the machinery used to turn the windrow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of factors may be involved, including the base materials going into the compost (Hoitink and Boehm 1999), the moisture, carbon availability and fungal diversity of the pile (Soares et al 1995), and the frequency and efficiency of turning operations (Churchill et al 1995). The most apparent difference between the two windrow composting facilities is that facility W2 has specially designed windrow turning equipment (Scarab compost turner), while facility W1 uses front-end loaders for turning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%