1972
DOI: 10.2307/3799095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of Wood Duck Broods from Dump Nests

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, acceptance of additional offspring may have little effect on the recipients. Heusman (1972) and Clawson et al (1979) found that wood duck young survived equally well in "parasitized" and "unparasitized" broods. Morse and Wight (1969) and Heusman et al (1980) observed comparable hatching success in "parasitized" and "normal" wood duck clutches.…”
Section: The Neutral Efsect Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, acceptance of additional offspring may have little effect on the recipients. Heusman (1972) and Clawson et al (1979) found that wood duck young survived equally well in "parasitized" and "unparasitized" broods. Morse and Wight (1969) and Heusman et al (1980) observed comparable hatching success in "parasitized" and "normal" wood duck clutches.…”
Section: The Neutral Efsect Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cess (Jones and Leopold 1967;Heusmann 1972;Heusmann et al 1980;Haramis and Thompson 1985;Sherman 1986, 2001;Semel et al 1988;Eadie 1991;Eadie et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower body mass of incubating females captured in nest boxes versus females and males captured in traps earlier in the season apparently reflected a loss associated with the reproductive cost of incubation (Hepp et al, 1990) rather than an adverse effect from lead. Compared with normal nests, the abandonment rate of dump nests was higher (Bellrose et al, 1964;Grice and Rogers, 1965) or was slightly lower (Heusmann, 1972). The large proportion of dump nests suggested a relatively high density of wood ducks in the area; however, the nest boxes generally were conspicuous and closely spaced together, two prerequisites for increasing dump nesting or brood parasitism (Semel et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 66 clutches, 31 (47%) contained >15 eggs and were classified as dump nests because of the high probability that more than one female had laid eggs in these nests (Grice and Rogers, 1965;Heusmann, 1972;Bellrose, 1976). Of these, 81 boxes (46%) were active and their 83 clutches contained 1,148 eggs.…”
Section: Nestingmentioning
confidence: 99%