2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-1024-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival prediction and frequency of anticancer treatment in cancer patients hospitalized due to acute conditions. Role of clinical parameters and PaP score

Abstract: Although the PaP score accurately predicts life expectancy, its use in the setting of acute conditions seems not straightforward, due to the overall good prognosis of these patients. Active treatment in the last period of life is common. The potential reversibility of acute conditions makes prognostic measures inadequate for the purpose of treatment choices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 Our study has many strengths, including its multicenter, prospective design with 2426 patients, the inclusion of patients receiving anticancer therapy, and a systemic and comprehensive assessment of the prognostic value. Accurate survival prediction assists oncologists in making decisions and may prevent unnecessary cancer treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Our study has many strengths, including its multicenter, prospective design with 2426 patients, the inclusion of patients receiving anticancer therapy, and a systemic and comprehensive assessment of the prognostic value. Accurate survival prediction assists oncologists in making decisions and may prevent unnecessary cancer treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some data to suggest parameters that can help with prognostication. The PaP model (incorporating biochemical information and physician's survival predictions) was useful for predicting survival in those with good performance status [19]. Despite the use of such models, physicians still have difficulty; in the study by Christakis et al, only 20 % of physicians prognosticated correctly and 63 % overestimated survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our new scoring system has been designed for patients referred for palliative treatment, whereas the PaP was designed for patients who received palliative care alone. The finding that the PaP is not appropriate for patients receiving active anticancer treatment has been recently suggested in a series of 208 patients with a median survival of 19 weeks who had been admitted to a department of medical oncology and radiotherapy in Italy 16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%