2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival predictors associated with signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE): A population-based retrospective cohort study

Abstract: PurposeSignet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE) is an uncommon tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is still no consensus regarding cut-off values for tumor size, age and optimal treatment for SRCCE. Thus, we elucidated the current survival outcomes of patients with SRCCE and analyzed factors associated with prognosis.MethodsA retrospective cohort study based on the SEER (The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program database was conducted. We identified 537 pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,[8][9][10] One study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results identified poor prognostic factors for survival but only in esophageal SRC patients. 11 It is difficult to adequately determine the pathologic and prognostic differences between esophageal SRC and nonsignet adenocarcinoma (AC), because of how rare esophageal SRC is. 12 The objective of this study was to understand the difference in clinical presentation and stage-specific treatment and survival outcomes of patients with esophageal SRC versus those with esophageal AC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,[8][9][10] One study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results identified poor prognostic factors for survival but only in esophageal SRC patients. 11 It is difficult to adequately determine the pathologic and prognostic differences between esophageal SRC and nonsignet adenocarcinoma (AC), because of how rare esophageal SRC is. 12 The objective of this study was to understand the difference in clinical presentation and stage-specific treatment and survival outcomes of patients with esophageal SRC versus those with esophageal AC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several predictive models are currently available for oesophageal cancer (13,14,16,19,20), but none of them focus on SRC carcinoma of the oesophagus. Current studies on the prognosis of SRC of the oesophagus suggest that female sex, unmarried, invasion of adjacent organs, a high tumour grade, metastasis of regional lymph nodes or distant organs and no chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors (21,22). However, the sample sizes of these studies were small and some prognostic factors associated with oesophageal SRC were found, but no predictive models were further constructed and validated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[8][9][10] These treatments are associated with limited benefits in overall survival, and median survival in the majority of clinical trials is 12 to 20 months. 9,[11][12][13] Although several prognostic and predictive factors have been investigated, including patient and tumor characteristics, none of these have provided strategies based on the unique biomarkers in GSRC. Due to inadequate predictive biomarkers, some patients were detrimentally overtreated with chemotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 10 These treatments are associated with limited benefits in overall survival, and median survival in the majority of clinical trials is 12 to 20 months. 9 , 11 - 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%