2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival processing versus self-reference: A memory advantage following descriptive self-referential encoding

Abstract: Previous research has shown that rating words for their relevance to a survival scenario leads to better retention of the words than rating them for self-reference. Past studies have, however, relied exclusively on an autobiographical self-reference task in which participants rate how easily a common noun brings to mind a personal experience. We report five experiments comparing survival processing to a descriptive self-reference task in which participants rated how well trait words described them. Rating trai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demonstrating that the survival advantage remains intact when paired against an autobiographical control is important because self-referential processing has frequently been used to account for the survival benefit in the traditional relevance-rating paradigm (e.g., Burns et al, 2011;Cunningham et al, 2013;Dewhurst et al, 2017). In our original report (Nairne et al, 2007), we used a self-relevant control that required people to rate how easily a target This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Demonstrating that the survival advantage remains intact when paired against an autobiographical control is important because self-referential processing has frequently been used to account for the survival benefit in the traditional relevance-rating paradigm (e.g., Burns et al, 2011;Cunningham et al, 2013;Dewhurst et al, 2017). In our original report (Nairne et al, 2007), we used a self-relevant control that required people to rate how easily a target This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstrating that the survival advantage remains intact when paired against an autobiographical control is important because self-referential processing has frequently been used to account for the survival benefit in the traditional relevance-rating paradigm (e.g., Burns et al, 2011; Cunningham et al, 2013; Dewhurst et al, 2017). In our original report (Nairne et al, 2007), we used a self-relevant control that required people to rate how easily a target word “brings to mind an important personal experience.” Survival processing produced significantly better retention than this control condition, but Klein (2012) argued persuasively that participants must actually retrieve the autobiographical experience to maximize the beneficial effect of self-relevant processing; simply asking the participant to rate the ease with which something comes to mind may not require retrieval of any specific autobiographical event.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typically, no rationale has been given for selecting one task (e.g., pleasantness) as opposed to the other (e.g., moving). Beyond this, other work has made use of a variety of encoding control tasks such as ratings of self-relevance (e.g., Dewhurst, Anderson, Grace, & Boland, 2017), or zombie attacks, (e.g., Bonin et al, 2019). Use of these (and maybe even relevance) as control tasks remain for future work that combines adaptive memory processing and directed forgetting.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%