Survival rate and stability of surface-treated and non-surface-treated orthodontic mini-implants: a randomized clinical trial

Ravi, Janani; Duraisamy, Sangeetha; Rajaram, Krishnaraj; Kannan, Ravi; Arumugam, Edeinton

doi:10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321345.oar

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These studies were published between 2008 [ 16 , 73 ] and 2023 [ 110 , 111 ]. The number of patients included varied mostly between 20 and 40 patients, except in four studies that included 8, 9, 13 and 17 participants [ 14 , 111 , 112 , 113 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surface Treatment of Dental Mini-Sized Implants and Screws: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Figueiredo,

Travassos,

Nunes

et al. 2024

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Miniscrews are devices that allow for absolute skeletal anchorage. However, their use has a higher failure rate (10–30%) than dental implants (10%). To overcome these flaws, chemical and/or mechanical treatment of the surface of miniscrews has been suggested. There is no consensus in the current literature about which of these methods is the gold standard; thus, our objective was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on surface treatments of miniscrews. The review protocol was registered (PROSPERO CRD42023408011) and is in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A bibliographic search was carried out on PubMed via MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. The initial search of the databases yielded 1684 results, with 98 studies included in the review, with one article originating from the search in the bibliographic references of the included studies. The results of this systematic review show that the protocols of miniscrew surface treatments, such as acid-etching; sandblasting, large-grit and acid-etching; photofunctionalization with ultraviolet light; and photobiomodulation, can increase stability and the success of orthodontic treatment. The meta-analysis revealed that the treatment with the highest removal torque is SLA, followed by acid-etching. On the other hand, techniques such as oxidative anodization, anodization with pre-calcification and heat treatment, as well as deposition of chemical compounds, require further investigation to confirm their effectiveness.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surface Treatment of Dental Mini-Sized Implants and Screws: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Figueiredo,

Travassos,

Nunes

et al. 2024

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mini implants must have a specific mechanical resistance, resistance to corrosion in the physiological environment in which they will be inserted [14]. The use of surface treatment of mini-implants with sandblasting followed by acid etching to remove contaminants is also suggested to create surface roughness and promote the assimilation of osteoblasts on the surface of the mini-implant, resulting in a improved contact between the bone and the mini-implant and better clinical stability [15]. In the study conducted by Ravi et al where they implemented the use of sandblasting followed by acid etching, it was observed that the mini-implants with treatment on their surface needed greater touch when being removed from the oral cavity, this could demonstrate that the secondary stability of the mini-implant can be improved with the adequate surface treatment [15].…”

Section: Composition Of Mini Implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although bacteremia is likely to cause infection and sepsis when immune mechanisms fail due to systemic problems in the host [24]. As reported in different articles, antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary in high-risk interventions, such as dental extraction (40%), periodontal surgery (58%) [14,15] and intraligamentary injections (97%), but bleeding is not decisive for detect bacteremia since it could be found in procedures without bleeding [24]. In a study carried out by Feizbakhsh et al, they investigated the probability that bacteremia may occur, in patients susceptible to infective endocarditis, after the placement of the mini implant in orthodontic treatment.…”

Section: Complications In the Insertion Of Mini-implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Primary stability is defined as the stability of the mini-implant immediately after insertion and which depends mainly on mechanical interlocking with the cortical bone [21,22], but over time secondary stability is also expected to be obtained and this is based in bone remodeling around the mini-implant and is responsible for the clinical stability of the implant during orthodontic treatment [15].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stability of Mini Implants in the Periodontum during Orthodontic Treatment

2023

MCDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In orthodontic treatment, forces are used to perform tooth movements depending on the magnitude, direction and duration, generating cellular and vascular responses in the periodontium. Orthodontic movement involves inflammatory responses resulting from this damage repair process. With the introduction of mini implants in orthodontic treatment, it allows us to obtain better control over the patient's movements by decreasing the load on the teeth such as in case of retraction, intrusions of a tooth or sector and mesializations. Unfortunately, it has been reported that between 13.4% and 20.1% of IMs loosen and fail shortly after placement. Sufficient primary stability is one of the determining factors [1]. The stability of the mini-implant can be influenced by the way of placement or direction of the implant, bone quality, loading force, adhesion and bacterial proliferation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the stability of mini-implants in the periodontium during orthodontic treatment. Methodology: it is a bibliographic systematic review work, qualitative design through the systematic review of articles. Using the PudMed, Scielo, Dialnet and some university repositories databases. Conclusions: The primary stability of mini-implants is considered the most important criterion to evaluate the success rate of orthodontic mini-implants

show abstract

“…Apart from transversal expansion, multiple orthodontics conditions call for maximum skeletal anchorage, with the hard palate and the interradicular space of the alveolar crest being preferred insertion sites for orthodontic implants [ 12 , 13 ]. Orthodontic implants have experienced an increasing popularity over the last decades, improving anchorage and expanding treatment options for adult patients [ 14 , 15 ]. Consequently, knowledge of the respective anatomy is crucial for the accurate positioning and stability of orthodontic implants, avoiding premature implant loss.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults

Willershausen,

Ehrenfried,

Krautkremer

et al. 2023

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Skull morphology and growth patterns are essential for orthodontic treatment, impacting clinical decision making. We aimed to determine the association of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on midface parameters as measured in 3D CT datasets. Materials and methods After sample size calculation, a total of 240 fully dentulous patients between 20 and 79 years of age (mean age: 42 ± 15), who had received a CT of the skull within the scope of trauma diagnosis or intracranial bleeding, were retrospectively selected. On the basis of cephalometric analysis, using MPR reconstructions, patients were subdivided into three different vertical skull configurations (brachyfacial, mesofacial, dolichofacial) and the respective skeletal Class I, II, and III relationships. Anatomic parameters were measured using a three-dimensional post-processing console: the thickness of the maxillary and palatine bones as well as the alveolar crest, maxillary body and sutural length, width and height of the hard palate, maxillary facial wall thickness, and masseter muscle thickness and length. Results Individuals with brachyfacial configurations had a significantly increased palatal and alveolar ridge thicknesses compared to those with dolichofacial- or mesofacial configurations. Brachyfacial configurations presented a significantly increased length and thickness of the masseter muscle (4.599 cm; 1.526 cm) than mesofacial (4.431 cm; 1.466 cm) and dolichofacial configurations (4.405 cm; 1.397 cm) (p < 0.001). Individuals with a skeletal Class III had a significantly shorter palatal length (5.313 cm) than those with Class I (5.406 cm) and Class II (5.404 cm) (p < 0.01). Sutural length was also significantly shorter in Class III (p < 0.05). Conclusions Skeletal configurations have an impact on parameters of the bony skull. Also, measurable adaptations of the muscular phenotype could result. Clinical relevance The association between viscerocranial morphology and midface anatomy might be beneficial for tailoring orthodontic appliances to individual anatomy and planning cortically anchored orthodontic appliances.

show abstract

Survival rate and stability of surface-treated and non-surface-treated orthodontic mini-implants: a randomized clinical trial

Cited by 4 publications

References 27 publications

Surface Treatment of Dental Mini-Sized Implants and Screws: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Surface Treatment of Dental Mini-Sized Implants and Screws: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Stability of Mini Implants in the Periodontum during Orthodontic Treatment

Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About