2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04706-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival rates of different bearing surfaces with the same model of stem in total hip arthroplasty: predictive factors for revision surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, to better restore the anatomy and motor function of the hip, modular implants are an interesting model [7]. As a result, larger diameter metal-onmetal (MoM) bearing surfaces are being widely used, particularly in young and active patients with high functional requirements [8,9]. However, these materials have a high short-term failure rate in hip surgery [10,11], with many revisions performed for adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) [4] due to degradation and corrosion at modular prosthesis junctions [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to better restore the anatomy and motor function of the hip, modular implants are an interesting model [7]. As a result, larger diameter metal-onmetal (MoM) bearing surfaces are being widely used, particularly in young and active patients with high functional requirements [8,9]. However, these materials have a high short-term failure rate in hip surgery [10,11], with many revisions performed for adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) [4] due to degradation and corrosion at modular prosthesis junctions [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%